True, Percy, but should that constrain a respondent from utilising the full range of evidence, literature and logic to support their position which contradicts the ill-informed shopping list poster? If the shopping list poster can't understand the response then they could always ask for a simplification. But at the very least other interested readers will appreciate the background of scientific evidence which supports conventional science's position.
Maybe responding in depth to one of the shopping list assertions will give that poster a hint of what they don't know or have been informed by their source and cause them to more critically analyse their source. Optimistic I know, but there are many examples of former yecs who have discovered the error of their ways due to the information they have received.