Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proper standards of evidence and referencing
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 6 of 8 (207015)
05-11-2005 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Wounded King
05-11-2005 4:32 AM


Hi Wound,
Haven't read beyond your post yet, maybe others have addressed this already, but I wanted to give my own response to this:
Wounded King writes:
Jerry had a number of other arguments which I was not so convinced by. He suggested in an exchange with Mammuthus-
JDB writes:
Nah...I think that we will observe Internet debate etiquette. Bring your argument in your own words, cut and paste the relevant sections of the papers that support your argument.
Now I am not familiar with this particular ettiquette and it certainly isn't something covered in the forum guidelines here, although I have no doubt it may operate on a number of forums. Is there any reason why we should accede to someone elses particular preference for a form of reference?
Jerry has actually expressed precisely what we'd like to do here. The Forum Guidelines aren't sufficiently explicit about this, and an update to the Forum Guidelines has been discussed among moderators, and it is only awaiting my time to carry it out.
I don't think inaccessible articles should be off limits for citation here, but in such circumstances I think more substantial excerpts than is normally the case should be provided.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Wounded King, posted 05-11-2005 4:32 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024