myoglobin / hemoglobin

Hello,
Here is immediatelly my question for discussion.Evolutionists say that in the very beginning there was no myoglobin and hemoglobin in the living entities.
I read that tha icefish can very nicely live in the cold Antarctic environment without hemoglobin AND myoglobin. Why I mention this? Because i have a speculation that the first living beings without myoglobon and hemoglobin could survive only in the same type of cold environment.
However this is not at all probable. The atmosphere was very hot and very gaseous. So, if we would accept Darwinistic thinking what kind of living entities would live in that environment? Some kind of extremophiles?NOTE 1: I don't try to argue neither for evolution nor creation rather just try to find out contradictions in evolution theory. My motto is "NO BLIND ACCEPTANCE".
NOTE 2: I am not a proffesional scientist, so you can lough about my speculations. Still, discussion develops knowledge.Tnx
Nitai

Sorry for the delay commenting on this.You don't say anything about unicellular life, and early life is thought to have been unicellular and so completely without any need for myoglobin or hemoglobin. For example, amoebas get along fine without myoglobin and hemoglobin. For that reason I'm having trouble making sense of your post as a reasonable criticism that could form the basis for a new thread. Could you clarify?

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director