Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proper standards of evidence and referencing
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 4 of 8 (206944)
05-11-2005 5:34 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Wounded King
05-11-2005 4:32 AM


I think it really depends on the context.
Since Jerry claims to be doing science, and is prepared to make clams about what is or is not in the scientific literature it is reasonable to expect him to be aware of the relevant papers - especially on simple issues like the ones discussed - before being supplied with references.
If dealing with a non-scientist who says something on the lines of "I don't know of evidence for..." or "is there evidence for...?" then I suggest that quotes should be produced where practical, even though their value is limited where the paper itself is not conveniently available.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Wounded King, posted 05-11-2005 4:32 AM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Mammuthus, posted 05-11-2005 5:54 AM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024