How can you have separate authorities that might have conflicts to the Quran?
How can you have a government that doesn't derive its authority from the people? I mean, that's universal. All governments, even dictatorships, derive their authority from the consent of the governed; they have to, because the governed outnumber the government.
How can you propose to derive authority from a book? That simply doesn't work. So if we're going to derive authority from the people, which is impossible to avoid, why not do so transparently, through democracy?
With the western idea of separation, you bring homosexuals "out of the closet" (to use an American phrase) and put your religious believers in the closet with your government laws.
Again with the homosexuals. Obsess, much? What exactly to gay people have to do with the topic?
I feel that I am starting to go in circles trying to explain this concept of an Islamic state, so I think I will give the subject a rest.
I would think that it would be
blindingly, stunningly obvious that an Islamic state is only good for a situation where
everybody agrees, and not only that, agrees on what the Quran actually says. Clearly that's not the case in your, or anyone's religion.
Theocracy simply doesn't work unless everybody agrees on the religion and on the legitimacy of the system, and that's an impossible situation to achieve.