Creationists don't believe in creationism?

I have a theory that deep deep down, though they don't want to admit it to themselves, practically all creationists do not completely believe in creationism.My reasoning is as follows: No creationist, to my knowledge, has given an example of any evidence that, if found, would falsify a young earth or a global flood, in spite of being asked repeatedly. But of course there are all sorts of possible observations that would refute these theories. If creationists really, truly believed in these things, then they would readily respond to the challenge by offering a statement of potential falsifiability, in the certain knowledge that the falsifying evidence has not and would never be found. Their reluctance to do so reveals that deep down, they know that their ideas would not stand up to scrutiny.The falsifying evidence for my theory is a different, convincing reason for creationists not to give a statement of potential falsifiability for creationism.It sounds ridiculous, I know, that a group of people so reliant on faith would turn out to lack it. But I really don't see any major flaw in my logic. What do you guys think?

Thanks, but never mind. It's just an idea I had; I can see that there are many things here at EvC that would be far more worthwhile to discuss. Sorry for the trouble.But while I'm posting here at PNT, I'd like to say that joethemole's topic on the use of religion to control people is an interesting one; and I'd love to see a discussion on that. In fact I'd say that religion as a form of control is pretty much a truism. The discussion could be more along the lines of whether this control is justified, and whether the control that religion provides has had a good or bad effect on humanity, overall.