Chiroptera,
Still, one can see why some people would prefer the Linnean system. One really wants to say the lungfish, for example, are obviously fish, and, despite a phylogenic relationship to tetrapods, it does almost seem perverse to group lungfish with mammals as a group that is very separate from the teleosts. Stephen J. Gould even remarks on this in an essay (although I forgot which one).
It does seem wierd that humans ARE Sarcopterygians, but it's only a name of an inclusive group. The problem people have is when they try to jive Linnaean & Cladistics names, end up conflating them, & causing themselves confusion (got the T-shirt). Humans aren't fish! Right? Is there still such a thing as a "fish"?
Mark
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
™ Version 4.2