I consider myself an atheist, and I don't fit either of those definitions.
The existence of God is just a non-issue to me. Or at most, as much of an issue as the existence of radioactive, tap-dancing lemurs living in my small intestine.
Those lemurs would sure explain the occasional trouble I have pooping. But that's it. No lemur fur in the bowl, no sound of tap shoes in the night, no geiger counters going crazy when they get passed over my stomach.
I guess they... might still be there? But there's nothing to suggest it.
There seems to be a basic assumption in our culture that the idea of God has to be given
some credence. But to date, I can't get anyone to give me a valid reason why this should be the case... why the idea of God should be treated any more seriously than the idea of radioactive, tap-dancing lemurs. Hell, at the very least I can tell you what a lemur is, and identify these specific lemurs by their radioactivity and their dancing skill.
So, in the absence of any new evidence, neither God nor the lemurs really get another thought. They're non-issues.
So to answer your question, I'm an alemurist as well. But I don't think the lemurs are a credible enough idea to give them the dignity of alemognisticism.
"Creationists make it sound as though a theory is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night."
-Isaac Asimov
™ Version 4.2
