Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hammer found in Cretaceous layer
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 38 of 160 (174479)
01-06-2005 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by PurpleYouko
01-06-2005 1:24 PM


Re: The deed is done!
PS
odds are currently 4,512,875 - 1 against
Hey Syamsu! What point do you reckon these odds will be 'realized' then?
even if a large spaceship appears with a three headed pilot? and he opens all the doors?
LOL.
On a serious note the bit about bubbles is sly misdirection.
(1) Bubbles in castings are a problem because they weaken the castings, thus the inspections done to find them before product is shipped. Their incidence is low but constant. If it was high they would not use the process as it would result in too many failures.
(2) The hammer is fairly obviously not just cast iron, but worked\hammered into shape from a cast ingot. This process significantly alters the size and distribution of material inside the iron matrix. It severely reduces bubble size in the process of also making the iron stronger (albeit more brittle). Google on hard worked iron and steel.
Finally, the Chlorine content cannot be anything but taken from a surface sample: the only sample taken is the filings or else the whole story is not being told. The possibility of contamination of the surface with sweat (salt, sodium chloride) while the hammer was in use is also high, if not during collection of the filings -- without needing a source of chlorine in the environment (which is also probable given the existence of shells). There is also the process of quenching when working iron into shape and the quenching water could be salty, the dried salts then being pounded into the metal rather than forged with it.
Too many questions, not enough answers.
I say test the hammer, carbon date the handle, have the accretion analysed by a geologist familiar with accretions (especially the ferrous ones eh?) and lets see the results.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by PurpleYouko, posted 01-06-2005 1:24 PM PurpleYouko has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by PurpleYouko, posted 01-06-2005 4:09 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 40 of 160 (174490)
01-06-2005 4:50 PM


Wrought Iron -- the old way
Iron making process today are not like they used to be. There have been improvements in the technology that allow greater consistency.
One thing that may surprise people is that {iron} can be processed in a number of different ways with quite different results.
First I did a google on {iron impurities} and it turned up a couple of good historical information sites:
Antebellum Iron Works in Western Virginia
IRON, Written by Alex Boyce, 2003
Rather than getting iron to a molton state, it was heated until it could be worked - "wrought" - to drive most of the lumpy impurities out. This process can leave inclusions of any small structured material in the metal. Note also the bit about corrosion (from first reference):
Charcoal iron contains up to 5% silicates. Unlike alloys, the silicates do not bond with the iron. Instead, they remain separate and give the iron a fibrous appearance. Silicates do not oxidize, and therefore, give charcoal iron a high degree of rust proofing. There are works made of charcoal iron that have been exposed to the weather for several centuries and show very little sign of rusting.
Next, iron does combine with chlorine:
http://encarta.msn.com/text_761567901___0/Iron.html
Chemically, iron is an active metal. It combines with the halogens (fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, and astatine), sulfur, phosphorus, carbon, and silicon. It displaces hydrogen from most dilute acids. It burns in oxygen to form ferrosoferric oxide, Fe3O4. When exposed to moist air, iron becomes corroded, forming a reddish-brown, flaky, hydrated ferric oxide commonly known as rust.
Then there is the egyptian iron plate:
http://www.catchpenny.org/iron.html
The authors agreed with El Gayar and Jones regarding the structure of the iron plate, but they did not agree on the interpretation.
The unusual features are the absence of slag stringers and the very large number of other inclusions. These are unusual in that they contain large quantities of calcium (up to 60%), phosphorus (up to 15%), and some sodium, silicon and potassium. A number of chlorine-rich areas were also found. However, we do not agree with the view of El Gayar and Jones, that these inclusions indicate ancient primitive manufacture -- careless maybe, but not primitive. [p. 57-58]
The presence of chlorine in modern iron where the impurities are very strictly controlled in the smelting process would be something of a surprise, but the presence in historical wrought iron should not be unexpected.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 41 of 160 (174491)
01-06-2005 4:55 PM


one more for the road:
one more website on this issue:
http://gsa.confex.com/...1AM/finalprogram/abstract_27912.htm
As part of a broad study comparing mineral compositions from diverse hydrothermal systems, we analyzed a suite of silicates and sulfides from two dozen worldwide Fe-oxide-(Cu-Au-REE) deposits and related systems. We observed a distinctive association of Cl-rich biopyriboles accompanied by Co(As)-bearing sulfides, allanite and/or monazite, magnetite, REE-enriched apatite and titanite, marialitic scapolite, alkali feldspar, and ferropyrosmalite. Cl-bearing biotite (to 5.6 wt% Cl; ~40 mol% Cl in the OH site) and/or Cl-bearing amphibole (to 2.9 wt% Cl) were found at many of the localities examined.
I think that justifies a "'nuff said" on the topic.
Enjoy.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 01-06-2005 17:00 AM

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 47 of 160 (174551)
01-06-2005 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by roxrkool
01-06-2005 10:42 PM


Does anyone else have a problem with this:
Photo K16 shows that the density is about 10% greater near the surface. In this representation, colors are used to indicate the density of a particular region. The white areas are most dense, and the dark areas are least dense.
the surface (10% greater density) is dark and the inside (white is most dense) is white ...
It looks like an x-ray with a squiggly line to "look" scientific, imho.
also see http://EvC Forum: Hammer found in Cretaceous layer
on the Chlorine
This message has been edited by RAZD, 01-06-2005 23:17 AM

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by roxrkool, posted 01-06-2005 10:42 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by roxrkool, posted 01-07-2005 12:26 AM RAZD has replied
 Message 51 by PaulK, posted 01-07-2005 9:30 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 48 of 160 (174553)
01-06-2005 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Buzsaw
01-06-2005 10:51 PM


Re: Say What?
what do you think a collapsing coal mine would do to a cup that was left behind?
Just a thought.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Buzsaw, posted 01-06-2005 10:51 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2005 10:16 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 50 of 160 (174651)
01-07-2005 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by roxrkool
01-07-2005 12:26 AM


why?
"Dr Dino" is out to make a buck, and he finds the gullible YEC crowd is an easy target.
That doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by roxrkool, posted 01-07-2005 12:26 AM roxrkool has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 53 of 160 (174686)
01-07-2005 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Buzsaw
01-07-2005 10:16 AM


Re: Say What?
Would you agree that it would be possible to re-excavate such a collapse and find the cup "embedded" in coal?
I think of the straw punched through the telephone pole by a tornado ...
and as long as there are reasonable possibilities I am not going to leap to any one. k? especially one that doesn't involve reasonable explanations.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 01-07-2005 11:12 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Buzsaw, posted 01-07-2005 10:16 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 01-24-2005 7:59 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 54 of 160 (174689)
01-07-2005 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by PaulK
01-07-2005 9:30 AM


My opinion.
I think it is just a common x-ray, and the dark shell of the hammer is due to corrosion and signal scatter. This would be consistent with the wood being the least dense, the accreted rock next and the wrought iron the densest.
I think the claims about density etcetera are bogus. From the google search I did, it is entirely within known historic manufacturing ability, from chlorine content to shape to handle, etc.
I think the accretion was caused by chemical reaction with the metal, also a known process.
I think that Dr Dino is a scam artist that is taking advantage of gullible people.
That's my opinion for what it is worth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by PaulK, posted 01-07-2005 9:30 AM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by roxrkool, posted 01-07-2005 11:56 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 60 of 160 (174708)
01-07-2005 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by roxrkool
01-07-2005 11:56 AM


Re: My opinion.
yeah, I have trouble keeping them apart.
It is at the museum, so that would be Baugh.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by roxrkool, posted 01-07-2005 11:56 AM roxrkool has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 67 of 160 (174858)
01-07-2005 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by nator
01-07-2005 3:01 PM


Re: Say What?
LOL
partially eaten grilled cheese sandwich with the high-cheekboned, 1930's starlett-style image of the Virgin Mary on it.
It was on eBay and sold for $11,000.
time to get cooking peeps, there's money to be made in them thar hills!
of course they have to be pictures of the virgin or ma teressa or they wouldn't be miracles right?
a bun that looks like ((any old person)) is just mildly interesting ...
heh. I wonder if these people know that gullible is not in the dictionary ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by nator, posted 01-07-2005 3:01 PM nator has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 80 of 160 (175135)
01-09-2005 12:00 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Buzsaw
01-08-2005 7:17 PM


Re: Cup/Hammer Connection
or the fact that he has a number of questionable displays should make one seriously question the veracity of anything in the museum.
I have been to a number of roadside "museums" where a quick survey showed that time was better spent going in the opposite direction.
try a google on "american stonehenge" for an example.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Buzsaw, posted 01-08-2005 7:17 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 93 of 160 (175253)
01-09-2005 2:56 PM


topic drift - is hammer issue closed?
I take it from the lack of further comments on the hammer, one way or the other that this is pretty resolved in most peoples minds.
the cup is a different issue and should be another thread if people want to continue that, imho.
I think admin should close this for topic drift and because the hammer issue is as done as it is going to be.

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 119 of 160 (180398)
01-25-2005 7:17 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by Buzsaw
01-24-2005 7:59 PM


Re: Say What?
buzaw writes:
my apologies for not getting back to you sooner.
no prob: I understand the number imbalance and the effect that has. I usually take no answer as no real issue with the post and leave it at that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 01-24-2005 7:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 126 of 160 (182453)
02-01-2005 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Percy
01-29-2005 8:43 AM


Re: ?
you might want to edit that to the new site
Compelling Questions About The Grand Unified Theory

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Percy, posted 01-29-2005 8:43 AM Percy has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 133 of 160 (182962)
02-03-2005 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by jar
02-03-2005 10:34 AM


Re: anecdotal evidence
how about a POTM?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by jar, posted 02-03-2005 10:34 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by AdminAsgara, posted 02-03-2005 9:47 PM RAZD has replied
 Message 135 by jar, posted 02-03-2005 9:48 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024