I have an actual undergraduate text book - Mark Ridley's
Evolution (2nd Edition - 1996) I would report on what it says about the Miller-Urey experient but it seems to be absent entirely. It's so important to Evolution that one of the most comprehensive textbooks around doesn't even mention it.
Nor does Ernst Mayr's
What Evolution Is - also intended as an undergraduate level text.
Perhaps you can explain why you feel that the esperiment is one of the "most popular arguments for evolution".