Val writes: If there is a God then organic evolution is not present, if there is no God then your assumption of organic evolution is correct.
God and evolution could both exist. And even if God doesn't exist, evolution could still be wrong. Are you trying to limit the choices in order to make a point? If so, it might help to provide some additional clarification.
I thought Creationists didn't have a problem with evolution per se, just with evolution between kinds. Within this group there may be two sub-categories, one holding that change within a kind draws only upon variation already present within the genome, the other accepting the additional possibility of mutation.
Your point about the fossil record is worth emphasizing again. The Newell and Gould quotes warn against the mistake of interpreting the fossil history in the geologic column as a record of progress, but it is an easy trap to fall into, more so for laypeople I expect than scientists.