Is a Concept of a Designer unscientific?

[off topic rant...
This forum is dominated by a dozen, sharp thinking scholars, who will put you down you and call you ignorant if you think out of their highly scientific mind-set.This is only you first post and you've already been insulted by "betraying a staggering ignorance of scientific method" How rude and unwelcoming!For someone who has made an average of 10 posts a day for 17 months (yes over 6000) I would expect a little more consideration for a newbie.]A designer could be considered scientific if "he" fine tuned the universal constants/ laws of physics, i.e. the speed of light, the mass of sub atomic particles, the number of atoms, the strenght of gravity etc.

quote:

---

quote:

---

A designer could be considered scientific if "he" fine tuned the universal constants/ laws of physics, i.e. the speed of light, the mass of sub atomic particles, the number of atoms, the strenght of gravity etc.

---

​

This is nonsensical, really.

---

You are quite right, let me make another point...Currently there is not, and there never will be a scientific test to conclude with 100% certainty that our universe was not designed. Therefore, the concept of a designer is highly unscientific - i.e. completely magical. (I don't beleive in magic because defies the laws of physics)

Crashfrog,I clearly jumped to the wrong conclusions by viewing only 1 of your replies.apologies for the unjustified criticism.