Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Joshua's Long Day
sfripp
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 117 (124204)
07-13-2004 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Steen
07-12-2004 7:36 PM


How does physics relate to a point in creation?
Presumably there were no laws of physics before that point!
"Goddunit" sounds good!
But perhaps deceleration through magnetic feild inversion could be the mechanism? The energy from the momentum change could be dispered or transferred through the magnetic field taking away from the necessity of kinetic energy to rear its ugly head and break the planet apert. This would also cause a greater extension of the magnetic field into the surrounding space stopping or redirecting the amount of solar radiation that would get to the earths lower atmosphere which would otherwise have an extra days worth of heating up! Man that would be hot!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Steen, posted 07-12-2004 7:36 PM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Steen, posted 07-13-2004 10:18 PM sfripp has replied

  
sfripp
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 117 (124504)
07-14-2004 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Steen
07-13-2004 10:18 PM


quote:
Kind of like a Singularity inversion? Yes, that is one of the predominate thoughts on this hypothesis.
Is that sarcasm? mr Sheen!
quote:
But aren't we getting a bit off-topic as to how the Erath was NOT shredded to pieces if it suddenly stopped one day for 24 hours, then abruptly started up again?
Like I said, you would have to channel away the kinetic energy involved in the earths revolution. Because a magnetic field affects matter at an atomic level you could, in affect, put the brakes on at that level also. The kinetic energy could be changed into electromagnetic energy, as the field lines interact with the matter, strengthening the field (which has temporarily reversed, as it does on occasion)and causing a gravatational offset to nulify the change
of motion! This would make the earth a temporary self generator no longer absorbing electromagnetic energy from the sun. Istead the sun would absorb ours! Then when the field can no longer sustain itself due to the lack of energy the feild re-flip and revert to using the sun's energy!
Did you know that the sun changes it's magnetoshpere polarity quite frequently!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Steen, posted 07-13-2004 10:18 PM Steen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by jar, posted 07-14-2004 3:02 PM sfripp has replied
 Message 49 by Steen, posted 07-15-2004 9:39 PM sfripp has not replied
 Message 51 by coffee_addict, posted 07-16-2004 12:44 PM sfripp has not replied

  
sfripp
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 117 (125558)
07-19-2004 12:09 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by jar
07-14-2004 3:02 PM


quote:
Have you ever been in a car when it suddenly stops, say by hitting a bridge?
Who said that the earth stopped suddenly? The surface speed of the earth is 1000km/h try slowing it down over 2-3 hours and see if you notice!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by jar, posted 07-14-2004 3:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by jar, posted 07-19-2004 3:13 AM sfripp has not replied

  
sfripp
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 117 (125643)
07-19-2004 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by NosyNed
07-19-2004 4:25 AM


Re: nope
quote:
However, where in the Bible are the several hours of deceleration and acceleration mentioned
Jos 10:13 So the sun stood still,
and the moon stopped,
till the nation avenged itself on its enemies,
as it is written in the Book of Jashar.
The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day.
Jos 10:14 There has never been a day like it before or since
It doesn't mention a deceleration time, but for the sake of reconciling a long day scientifically it seemed appropriate! I doubt that anything on the earth would notice a gradual deceleration from 1000km/h over the space of hour, certainly not over 2-3 hours! In either case the sun would appear to remain in the ‘middle’ of the sky (depending on what you classify as the middle part of the sky? 30 degrees, 40?)
30 degrees would be approx 2 hours.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by NosyNed, posted 07-19-2004 4:25 AM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Percy, posted 07-19-2004 11:28 AM sfripp has not replied
 Message 62 by Steen, posted 07-22-2004 11:15 PM sfripp has not replied

  
sfripp
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 117 (125648)
07-19-2004 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by jar
07-19-2004 4:31 AM


Re: nope
quote:
Have you ever seen or heard the luggage stuffed in those compartments slide around during landing or takeoff?
Yes but decelerating from 350km/h to taxi speed in a little over a minute is a bit different! So is accelerating to 850km/h in around 5 min. If you have a sporty car that is capable of 0-100 in 5 seconds, that doesn't mean you wont survive! Continue that acceleration without air resistance and the motors limitations and it would take 50 second to reach 1000 km/h. The same inertia would be felt decelerating from that speed to 0. If there was 40 times less inertia, would it really bother you? (as would be if it took the earth 30 minutes to stop revolving)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by jar, posted 07-19-2004 4:31 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by zephyr, posted 07-19-2004 11:21 AM sfripp has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024