Is there evidence that dating methods MUST be invalid?

While we all know that their are problems with the dating methodologies, however, their appears to be some truth therein, the biblical standards if going within the gap theory is not in disagreement with an old earth, so we have a problem wherein the rocks themselves might date old, and the fossils buried within the rock sediments would need be young (Genesis creation event somewhere between 6,000 to 11,250 years ago), given most fossil imprints are dated by the sediments you need to look to the theories of how these sediments came to reside on the earths surface overtime (hydroplate theory)(kjv pslam 104). The biblical evidences suggest that the fountains of the deep erupted, we see volcanic eruptions all the time, but the bible was talking of a world wide eruptions of the waters, it talks of a future shaking of the earth not such as was since man was upon the earth, where the islands will be no more, so we have to look that the sediments on the earths surface might well of came from within the earth (the bibles inference of past shakings of the earth pre-flood), the erupting of the sediments from within the earth), the only good source to check on the age of the rock sediments deep within the earth comes from the Kola Well, and reputable scientists interestingly dating these rocks date millions even billions of years old, the problem with the dating methodologies is that they are dating the rocks to age the fossil imprints(so all fossil imprints will date old, if they are dating the rocks to age the imprint), "if" the rock sediments formed via the biblical fountains of the deep eruptions, you need evidences that these sediments would of dated old even before they erupted out from within the earth ([in the Kola study you have your evidence]). With leaching, mineralization, elements seeking equilibrium after the earth belched up these sediments over time, the dating methodologies simply confirms that the reason the rock sediments primarily all date millions of years old is because they erupted out from within the earth, the reason the stratification layerings date millions of years that buried the fossils record within the biblical context, and the reason the dating methods seem to be in agreement (dating methodologies is simply creating an illusion that the fossils are as old as the rock sediments). TOE needs to do this to remain viable, interestingly the Kola sediments date old, and is this not the same kind of sediments that Walt Brown believes by the forces of cavitation erupted within the flood waters, and perhaps pre-flood when God created the foundations of the earth (past pre-flood shakings of the earth before man was upon the earth)if so then why would not all the sediments not date old, like the sediments within the kola's super deep well core samplings, etc...ICDP: Error 404 - Page not found P.S. I'm taking a vacation, so wouldn't likely be back on line for a bit, seems though to me that your rocks should be dating old, cause the rock sediments deep within the earth dates old too(hydro-plate theory), but that doesn't mean the fossil imprints are as old as the rock sediments that buried them within(hydro-plate theory), that too me is simply an excuse by TOE to say the fossil imprints are old, cause they are found buried within these sediments, etc...