Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Request for Carbon-14 Dating explanation
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 6 of 74 (106064)
05-06-2004 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Justin Clark
05-06-2004 5:13 PM


Re: Carbon-14 Dating Explained
Hi, Odessan! I get over there now and again....
Welcome to EvC. I'd answer your question, but JonF already did more completely than I could even attempt.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Justin Clark, posted 05-06-2004 5:13 PM Justin Clark has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 05-06-2004 8:31 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 9 of 74 (106072)
05-06-2004 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by JonF
05-06-2004 8:39 PM


Re: Carbon-14 Dating Explained
There's another recent study (unfortunately so new that it isn't free on the Science website) that correlates varves in the Cariaco Basin off Venezuela with 14C dates, and compares five other correlations. They all line up very closely back to 30,000 years ago, and then differ by 5% or so back to 44,000 years or so.
Reference is Hughen, et al., Science, vol 303, pp 202-207 (2004).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by JonF, posted 05-06-2004 8:39 PM JonF has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 17 of 74 (106643)
05-08-2004 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by BobAliceEve
05-08-2004 7:25 AM


Re: More Questions
When I put the numbers (which I found in some science book) into his scientific calculator, both of our jaws dropped when the number 13,600 came out
GIGO at work, it sounds like. What do you think the average lifetime of a carbon dioxide molecule is in our atmosphere?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by BobAliceEve, posted 05-08-2004 7:25 AM BobAliceEve has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 23 of 74 (107090)
05-10-2004 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by BobAliceEve
05-10-2004 1:21 AM


Re: Absolutely
The reference I gave in post #9 of this thread gives 14C levels back to 50,000 years ago, but I don't think that will help you much. I'm pretty sure in mentions current rate of formation of 14C in the atmosphere: current rate of decay is the same it's always been - half of what you've got every 5730 years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by BobAliceEve, posted 05-10-2004 1:21 AM BobAliceEve has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 50 of 74 (107509)
05-11-2004 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by rickrose
05-11-2004 2:19 PM


Re: Courtesy
Rickrose: I'm sure we need a new thread for any real detail on dendrochronology, but in the meantime, you might look at Henri Grissino-Mayer's page:
http://web.utk.edu/~grissino/principles.htm
has definitions and an introduction to how the method works. He has zillions of links elsewhere on his site to the literature, but you may need to be able to read Finnish to make use of all of it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by rickrose, posted 05-11-2004 2:19 PM rickrose has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024