|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Haggard Scandal | |||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1657 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
I see ... being honest is immoral and lying is moral.
got it. we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 6100 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
Psalm 14:3
All have turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one. Psalm 53:3Everyone has turned away, they have together become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one. Except Ringo...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3543 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
nemesis_jug writes:
He wasn't the only one offended... and I'm not even gay.
I can see that you are a homosexual and that I offended you. If homosexual marriage is okay, relatively speaking, then so is marriage between a man and a child or a woman and a dog.
Yes, and I take it that in your little fantasy world consenting adults include little children and dogs too, right? Why don't we just throw in cars to be part of the "consenting adults" group? I've been driving my car for years now and have been for some time wanting to marry it.
The bottom line is, I was not referring to gays as dogs and children. I'm sorry if I had anything to do with that confusion.
Let me tell you something, I don't think you can be a christian and good person at heart at the same time. At least I have the guts to admit it. If you think gay people are like children and dogs, just say so.
I'm merely showing that moral relativism is a bit absurd when you view it in these contexts.
This same argument was used when interracial marriage was ruining the good christian society of America. Personally, I'm still waiting for fire and brimstones raining down on us from the whole giving the black man basic human rights thing. Edited by gasby, : No reason given. Place yourself on the map at http://www.frappr.com/evc The thread about this map can be found here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1657 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
... would exhibit far less violent crime than Taiwan or Japan, where the majority observe Eastern religions or are agnostics and atheists. Or european countries. Given that the rate of incarceration in the USof(N)A is second highest in the world (only Russia rates higher), ... ... one could easily claim that the high proportion of christian morality within the population ... ... where various polls say 80% to 90% of american claim to be christian ... ... is a contributary factor to the high rate of crime. After all, it absolves people of responsibility for their actions: it's not their fault, they are just another failed sinner. It would be interesting to compare societies based on the rates of violent crimes and see what the correlaries are. I do know that the rates of crime in the USof(N)A is much higher than in Canada and that correlating factors may include:
Enjoy. we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2421 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: He never disparaged his own military. Also, he never sent them into battle underequipped, undermanned, and with no clear strategy for how to get them out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
tudwell Member (Idle past 6230 days) Posts: 172 From: KCMO Joined: |
Matthew 25: 41 "Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.' 44 "They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' 45 "He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.' 46 "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life." There are two groups of people here. One group will not be expecting their good deeds to be good enough. And the other will be shocked at how little their deeds meant. I can see how you get that idea through the single bolded sentence you took out of context. In context, it's the group on the right that helped his fellow man ("one of the least of these my brethren"). The group on the left didn't, even if they were good to Jesus himself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2421 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What part of "consenting adult" do you have trouble understanding?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 6100 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
When did I ever say I was a good person? Jesus is saying the righteous are already saved Who is righteous? There is only one begotton Son of God. The difference between created and begotton. We cannot create that which is identical to us. We create machines and art work. We beget humanity. God creates humans, and begets God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Rob  Suspended Member (Idle past 6100 days) Posts: 2297 Joined: |
I can see how you get that idea through the single bolded sentence you took out of context. In context, it's the group on the right that helped his fellow man ("one of the least of these my brethren"). The group on the left didn't, even if they were good to Jesus himself. Then why is the group on the left, the one's trying to justify themselves? The one's on his right asked, "when did we do these things?" Certainly such do-gooders would remember their service to the poor. If you can get this... your life will change!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1657 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Show me a moral absolutist, and I will show you a moral relativist who absolutely wants to impose his relative morals on everybody else So... Can you shed light on what is wrong with that... No one will accept it as valid. Morals are personal values and cannot be imposed from without. Your morality and ethics govern what you do when no one is looking, as demonstrated by Haggard. All it creates is more laws being broken and less respect for laws overall, less compliance with them. Can you shed any light on what is beneficial about that? Enjoy. we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3543 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
schraf writes:
I think he thinks the word "adult" means anything that has mass.
What part of "consenting adult" do you have trouble understanding?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Silent H Member (Idle past 6071 days) Posts: 7405 From: satellite of love Joined: |
He just said what I told you he would say. You need to stop and think about this carefully as you are talking past him.
In the very quote you cited he sets the context for his statement as "relatively speaking". He is saying that the comparison would be true for relativists, which he most clearly is not.
No it is not, because there is no valid comparison between them. If you are claiming that there is an absolute true criteria that everyone must use regarding marriage such that no one can make a comparison between all of those situations... remember, situations and not the entities within the situations... then you are engaging in moral absolutism, and you are in fact conceding the very point NJ was trying to make. If you are claiming that he is wrong because even relativists would be unable to compare those situations, then you would be wrong. Relatively speaking those situations could (it would depend on the cultures one is looking at) be compared as identical. It all depends on the criteria used to judge them based on the culture. Perhaps an example taken outside the US will make this more clear. Theoretically there could be a society which allows any and all marriages as long as the two (assuming monogamy) appear to be happy together as judged by village elders (or a shaman). And one could find adults married to what we would call minors, as well as hetero, homo, and bestial marriages. There could even be marriages to trees and plants in that culture. Thus in their culture all of these are equivalent. A relativist would say that that particular society has a valid concept of marriage, whether the relativist enjoyed such a concept or not. NJ is arguing for the absurdity of such a situation, and that there are criteria that are universal or somehow obvious and those people's ways should be viewed as wrong based on those criteria. Further, denial of gay marriage, by absolutists (including NJ), would not require assumptions that gay and bestial marriage would be equal. They could use wholly different criteria, and it just so happens that both cases are denied legitimate status. Hell, you could easily have an absolutist that allows for marriage to some animals and not others, and still deny gay marriages. I hope you can see then, that you are pulling a direct insult out of a statement viewed out of context. He is making a much broader statement about relativists, not about gays. The irony being that it is in relativists that you are more likely to find allies for gay marriage than with absolutists such as NJ. That is indeed the strength of his argument and why it is used. It is an emotional appeal to get people to reject relativism based on inherent biases (tastes), and so undercut relativist arguments for such things as the legitimacy of gay marriage. holmes "What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2421 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Ah, now you are moving the goalposts.
quote: Maybe.
quote: Most abortions are performed in the first trimester when the embryo is around an inch and a half long. Nobody's going to see "severed heads coming out of the birth canal" during a typical abortion.
quote: What, you don't think women die from pregnancy? From the Wiki:
Maternal Mortality Ratio is the ratio of the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. The MMR is used as a measure of the quality of a health care system. Sierra Leone has the highest maternal death rate at 2,000, and Afghanistan has the second highest maternal death rate at 1900 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, reported by the UN based on 2000 figures. Lowest rates included Iceland at 10 per 100,000 and Austria at 4 per 100,000. In the United States, the maternal death rate was 17 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2000. "Lifetime risk of maternal death" accounts for number of pregnancies and risk. In sub-Saharan Africa the lifetime risk of maternal death is 1 in 16, for developed nations only 1 in 2,800. According to my math and after looking up some numbers, almost 700 women died from complications of child birth in the US in 2002.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein. AdminPD Edited by AdminPD, : Warning
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Silent H Member (Idle past 6071 days) Posts: 7405 From: satellite of love Joined: |
What part of "consenting adult" do you have trouble understanding?
Berb is already going through this same mistake. If you agree that there are universal standards then NJ has made his point, regardless of if you happen to disagree which criteria are the universal standard. If you believe there are no such things as universal standards, and in fact morals are relative, then you will have to concede that "consenting adult" is not a true absolute criteria and the situations he is describing could be considered equally valid. holmes "What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 663 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Rob writes: Psalm 14:3 Psalm 53:3 Haven't you heard the "good news"? There's a New Testament. Why are you using the Old Testament to supercede the New? Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024