Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Pope Thread
paisano
Member (Idle past 6441 days)
Posts: 459
From: USA
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 61 of 106 (201135)
04-22-2005 9:48 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by kjsimons
04-22-2005 9:14 AM


I'm not going to turn this into a debate on demographics - that would be off topic. However I have evidence to do so, should I wish to. Your mild invective is no more than self-gratification.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by kjsimons, posted 04-22-2005 9:14 AM kjsimons has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by kjsimons, posted 04-22-2005 10:00 AM paisano has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 62 of 106 (201137)
04-22-2005 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by nator
04-22-2005 9:17 AM


Out of touch could be a screen for "not agreeing with us that sin is good" and thereby following the sinful, by obeying what their sins demand.
Basically, you're asking biblicans to endorse sin, by saying "get with the times".
Human population growth is causing the rapid degradation of the global environment. The Church could go a long way towards helping this problem by
How ironic. You're saying it's the fault of those who are celibate that human population is up? Lol. Maybe if people obeyed the bible, there wouldn't be a problem.
That's fallacious Shraff girly, the real problem is that people are going against what God says, NOT the the fault of those who in this instance, DO as God says.
Oh how typical, "hey celibate Pope dude, it's your fault there's babies, because we can't stop shagging". Oh yeah Shraff, there's a logic in there somewhere, but mikey just can't find it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 9:17 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by CK, posted 04-22-2005 10:10 AM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 66 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 10:11 AM mike the wiz has replied

  
paisano
Member (Idle past 6441 days)
Posts: 459
From: USA
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 63 of 106 (201142)
04-22-2005 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by crashfrog
04-22-2005 1:20 AM


It's more akin to a vegan's daughter being forced to eat meat against the wishes of her parent...
It is my understanding that Mr. Newdow's ex-spouse, who had custody of the daughter, had different opinions regarding theism and how the daughter should be exposed to it. Mr Newdow is entitled to his views, however IMO has inflated a garden - variety cutodial dispute into the Brave Rationalist vs. the Oppressive Theocracy.
And, yes, coercion doesn't have to be by legal means. Social coercion has always been recognized by the courts.
Quite so. However, if one is going to take an unpopular stand on principle, one must be prepared to accept the reasonably forseeable consequences -ask Martin Luther King. Students SHOULD be able to opt out of the POA without opprobrium - but kids are kids.
It's unfortunate that some theists seem to feel they must coerce others into their belief system - but that's life. And there is intra-theist coercion, but a polite "No thanks, I'm Catholic" seems to work with the young men on bicycles who visit me periodically.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by crashfrog, posted 04-22-2005 1:20 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by crashfrog, posted 04-22-2005 10:32 AM paisano has replied

  
kjsimons
Member
Posts: 822
From: Orlando,FL
Joined: 06-17-2003
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 64 of 106 (201143)
04-22-2005 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by paisano
04-22-2005 9:48 AM


One could make the case that all posts here are to some degree "no more than self-gratification", but the fact still is that the world wide human population is growing exponentially and shows no signs of slowing. Industrialized nations have seen a reduction in births, but still a net increase in population due to immigration. What "evidence" do you have that shows human depopulation?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by paisano, posted 04-22-2005 9:48 AM paisano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by paisano, posted 04-22-2005 11:41 AM kjsimons has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4146 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 65 of 106 (201147)
04-22-2005 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by mike the wiz
04-22-2005 9:50 AM


take no notice
DOH!
This message has been edited by General Krull, 22-Apr-2005 09:14 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 9:50 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:25 AM CK has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 66 of 106 (201148)
04-22-2005 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by mike the wiz
04-22-2005 9:50 AM


quote:
Out of touch could be a screen for "not agreeing with us that sin is good"
More like "not agreeing with them that X is a sin at all."
quote:
Basically, you're asking biblicans to endorse sin, by saying "get with the times".
If you lived in an locked house that was meant to house 6 people, but instead it was crammed to the rafters with 60 people that never left for any reason because some of the people's religion said that more people in the house is always better, would you think it was "sinful" to perhaps prevent more people from entering the house?
Human population growth is causing the rapid degradation of the global environment. The Church could go a long way towards helping this problem by
quote:
How ironic. You're saying it's the fault of those who are celibate that human population is up?
Yes, that is ironic, isn't it, that the people who don't bear the children or are responsible for raising them are dictating such edicts to the people who do and are?
quote:
Lol. Maybe if people obeyed the bible, there wouldn't be a problem.
Maybe if more people used birth control, there wouldn't be a problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 9:50 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:22 AM nator has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 67 of 106 (201152)
04-22-2005 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by nator
04-22-2005 10:11 AM


Maybe if more people used birth control, there wouldn't be a problem.
That's the worldly offering ofcourse, but the real solution is always found in God. Obeying the scriptures removes the cause AND stops the problem. That's 2-1 to Yahweh.
Yes, that is ironic, isn't it, that the people who don't bear the children or are responsible for raising them are dictating such edicts to the people who do and are?
Who do they dictate to? Atheists aswell? Why is it only "families" you mention? Or "males"? You mentioned catholic celibate males (pope and such). I wondered why you think it's their sin? They might dictate certain things but they are not the cause of the problem.
More like "not agreeing with them that X is a sin at all."
You don't get to decide what isn't sin. The bible says which is sin, and if anyone disagress it's irrelevant, as there would be no problem if everyone followed what God says to do.
If you lived in an locked house that was meant to house 6 people, but instead it was crammed to the rafters with 60 people that never left for any reason because some of the people's religion said that more people in the house is always better, would you think it was "sinful" to perhaps prevent more people from entering the house?
This is just a stumbling block for mikey.
Why, there wouldn't be 60 in one house if us westerners didn't have a house each.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 10:11 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by nator, posted 04-22-2005 10:42 AM mike the wiz has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 68 of 106 (201153)
04-22-2005 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by CK
04-22-2005 10:10 AM


Shraff's Knight in shining armour
Too late, mike's omni-eyes read it.
It's okay Charles, you shouldn't have deleted it. Maybe I was a bit mis-representative of what she said. Sorry if I was a bit naughty but Shraff knows I put a certain mikey-spin on things that make them think.
This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 04-22-2005 09:26 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by CK, posted 04-22-2005 10:10 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by CK, posted 04-22-2005 10:28 AM mike the wiz has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4146 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 69 of 106 (201155)
04-22-2005 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by mike the wiz
04-22-2005 10:25 AM


Re: Shraff's Knight in shining armour
I thought about it and then thought - I really don't want to get into this one.
But you were a bit too quick for me......
:-)
(what our americans may not realise is that the sun is shining in the UK and that tends to make us brits go all giddy - because it is so rare).
This message has been edited by General Krull, 22-Apr-2005 09:35 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:25 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:41 AM CK has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1485 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 70 of 106 (201158)
04-22-2005 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by paisano
04-22-2005 9:59 AM


It is my understanding that Mr. Newdow's ex-spouse, who had custody of the daughter
Newdow has joint custody and legal guardianship.
Mr Newdow is entitled to his views, however IMO has inflated a garden - variety cutodial dispute into the Brave Rationalist vs. the Oppressive Theocracy.
I don't think there's anything inflated about it. The Supreme Court of our government thinks that having a civil religion doesn't enforce religion on anybody. Presumably their rationale is "well, everybody believes in God already. Well, except for the atheists, but they don't count." Sorry, I'm not going to allow the government to tell me that I don't count.
However, if one is going to take an unpopular stand on principle, one must be prepared to accept the reasonably forseeable consequences -ask Martin Luther King.
...
You're actually saying that Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination was his own fault? That he asked for it? How can you say such an offensive thing?
It's unfortunate that some theists seem to feel they must coerce others into their belief system - but that's life.
It's also unconstitutional.
And there is intra-theist coercion, but a polite "No thanks, I'm Catholic" seems to work with the young men on bicycles who visit me periodically.
"I'm not interested" has always worked pretty well for me. But if they barge in my door anyway, I'm calling the police. They don't get to hide behind "but that's life" any more than any other criminal does, and trying to force your religion on someone else in a situation where they have no option to decline is criminal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by paisano, posted 04-22-2005 9:59 AM paisano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by paisano, posted 04-22-2005 11:00 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1485 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 71 of 106 (201159)
04-22-2005 10:36 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Dr Jack
04-22-2005 4:33 AM


Time renders transgressions irrelevant, beating up on someone for something they did sixty years ago and haven't done since is irrelevant, unjust and unreasonable.
That's your defense for him? That he didn't join the Hitler Youth again? That would have been hard, considering the organization no longer existed and he was no longer a youth.
Well, hey. Not to get overdramatic but none of the 9/11 hijackers have hijacked any more planes. Guess they're not all that bad of guys, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Dr Jack, posted 04-22-2005 4:33 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Dr Jack, posted 04-22-2005 10:41 AM crashfrog has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 72 of 106 (201160)
04-22-2005 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by CK
04-22-2005 10:28 AM


Re: Shraff's Knight in shining armour
I think she'll apreciate you pouncing to her cause, which is a just effort because Shraff is a goodly one.
This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 04-22-2005 09:41 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by CK, posted 04-22-2005 10:28 AM CK has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3


Message 73 of 106 (201161)
04-22-2005 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by crashfrog
04-22-2005 10:36 AM


You're seriously telling me that whatever else he has or hasn't do in his life the mere fact he was in the hitler youth renders him morally reprehensible for the rest of his life? Come on!
Well, hey. Not to get overdramatic but none of the 9/11 hijackers have hijacked any more planes. Guess they're not all that bad of guys, right?
If they'd survived, and then lived for sixty years as decent people, yeah, I'd say the fact they hijacked a plane sixty years ago was pretty irrelevant to an assessment of them now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by crashfrog, posted 04-22-2005 10:36 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 04-22-2005 10:48 AM Dr Jack has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 74 of 106 (201163)
04-22-2005 10:42 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by mike the wiz
04-22-2005 10:22 AM


quote:
That's the worldly offering ofcourse, but the real solution is always found in God. Obeying the scriptures removes the cause AND stops the problem. That's 2-1 to Yahweh.
So, when the Bible says "Be fruitful and multiply", how is it addressing the overpopulation and resulting global environmental degradation, and poverty due to inadequate resources we see are currently facing?
quote:
Who do they dictate to? Atheists aswell?
Inasmuch as the Catholic Church has influence over governments, yes, they dictate to Athiests and all non-Catholics.
Catholics constitute almost one fifth of the world's population, mike. 200 heads of state attended the late Pope's funeral.
I'd say that makes the Catholic Church very, very influential in the world.
quote:
Why is it only "families" you mention? Or "males"? You mentioned catholic celibate males (pope and such). I wondered why you think it's their sin? They might dictate certain things but they are not the cause of the problem.
The leadership of the Catholic Church are entirely (supposedly) celibate, (supposedly) straight, forbidden to marry, and male.
(There is no Biblical requirement for them to be any of these things, BTW)
They are dictating behaviors to people regarding issues they are completely divorced from. They cannot relate at all.
quote:
You don't get to decide what isn't sin.
Why not, the people who run the Catholic Church certainly do, and they change their minds on what is a sin and what isn't?
What makes them better than me?
quote:
The bible says which is sin,
And the people in the Church are interpreting it in different ways depending upon the times. It used to be a sin to belive the earth orbited the sun, remember.
quote:
and if anyone disagress it's irrelevant, as there would be no problem if everyone followed what God says to do.
So, if everybody stopped using birth control, would the environmental degradation get better or worse?
Please answer the question below.
The "house" is the earth.
If you lived in an locked house that was meant to house 6 people, but instead it was crammed to the rafters with 60 people that never left for any reason because some of the people's religion said that more people in the house is always better, would you think it was "sinful" to perhaps prevent more people from entering the house?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 10:22 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by mike the wiz, posted 04-22-2005 11:30 AM nator has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1485 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 75 of 106 (201165)
04-22-2005 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Dr Jack
04-22-2005 10:41 AM


You're seriously telling me that whatever else he has or hasn't do in his life the mere fact he was in the hitler youth renders him morally reprehensible for the rest of his life?
No.
No, it doesn't. I understand the conditions of wartime Germany and the pressures he was under. Not everybody in the German army was a bad guy; not everyone in the Hitler Youth was really a Nazi.
I have tolerance and understanding for the conditions that led to him being a part of something that we now find morally objectionable. I'm willing to let that go because I don't think he has a choice.
What I can't forgive is his own lack of tolerance or sympathy for those in exactly the same situation. It's the moral hypocrisy of his hard-line views that I can't abide, and that I judge him for.
Is that more clear?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Dr Jack, posted 04-22-2005 10:41 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Dr Jack, posted 04-25-2005 6:05 AM crashfrog has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024