|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: true religion | |||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: If someone strolls out in public and starts telling people what to believe, why do you see it as an attack if the response is, "why should I believe that?"
quote: People with no faith in God are not necessarily faithless. Their faith is simply not directed where you would like it to be. ----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: And?
quote: Or that you simply shouldn't expect anyone else to believe you.
quote: It is clearly stated in The Iliad that if a warrior falls in battle he will live forever in the Elysian Fields. Are you rushing out to grab your spear?
quote: It has nothing to do with cynicism. It's simple credulity. ----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: This from the guy who didn't want anyone attacking him.
quote: Ahem... first of all, Iliad is not a person, and cannot die for anything. Secondly, you're entirely missing the point. Why should what one book says be more convincing than what another says? Both refer to supernatural occurances, including God (or gods), both tell you how you can go to paradise after you die. So why aren't you making sacrifices to Zeus? Because writing something down doesn't make it true.
quote: So it's numbers that matter now? Well... leaving aside the fact that this means Britney Spears is the best musician in the world right now... Islam is the most widely practiced religion on the planet. (If you don't lump all different sects of Christianity into one group.) Are you going to start praying towards Mecca now that everybody's doing it? Of course not. Because saying that high numbers of believers is proof that you should believe would be a basic logical fallacy. Argumentum ad populum.
quote: Why should I? They want to believe, they can go right ahead. They seem happy enough. But if they approach me and ask me to believe it too, they should expect me to ask them why I should. (Which is what you took offense to in the first place.) -----------Dan Carroll [This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 05-12-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: As is the Iliad. It's the story of the Trojan War. "Based" is the key word here.
quote: And that reason was a logical fallacy.
quote: You brought up sales. By the standards you were using, it makes Britney Spears the best musician out there right now. Again, it's a logical fallacy.
quote: Who said you had to? But what you seem to want is to deliver a sermon, not have a discussion. Which makes me wonder why you're posting your opinions on a discussion board.
quote: Again, if you want to deliver sermons without response, this may not be the best venue.
quote: I can point to a truck, and define what it is and how it works. Can you say as much about God? ----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
Mike... no one's trying to attack you, or change your mind, or get you to deny your faith or anything. If you want to believe in Christianity, go right ahead.
But if you're going to stroll out in public and start telling people that they should also believe in Christianity, they're going to ask you why they should. If your reasons don't meet their standards, they're going to point out why that is. If you want to read that as an attack, that's your business. ----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: From post #15:
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
And if I'm not mistaken (which I might well be), wasn't it fairly common practice in the Roman Empire to deify political figures after they died?
----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: Or because you weren't listening to the responses you got. Here, I'll sum them up for you again. The bible says that you should believe in its creation myth. You do so. The bible also says there are unicorns. But you don't believe in unicorns. Why is one part of the bible to be taken literally and another not? The relative importance of the two don't matter. The bible claims that every word in it is the word of God. Therefore, the word of God says that there are unicorns. Is God lying? Or is God's word unimportant in that section? Or is it more likely that the bible is not a work intended to be taken literally? -----------Dan Carroll [This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 05-20-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: Show me on this forum where anyone said you should have faith in animals? We were asking why you took a literal reading of the bible. If you do believe that unicorns and faries exist, (which is different from having faith in them) that's your business. We assumed you didn't. Our mistake. ----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
Fair enough; I spoke too soon. My apologies. To sum up, you believe in unicorns and fairies, but do not have faith in them.
----------------------------- Dan Carroll
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025