Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 50 (9181 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,278 Year: 5,535/9,624 Month: 560/323 Week: 57/143 Day: 0/19 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   morality, charity according to evolution
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 240 of 243 (365657)
11-23-2006 9:56 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by Hyroglyphx
07-06-2006 8:46 PM


The evolution of morality - and game theory.
You're speaking about yeast as if there is some sort of cognizance behind their actions. And being that they are single-celled fungi, I highly doubt that they could possibly display any kind of reasoning ability beyond, "must eat."
So rather than assign consciousness to the results, consider instead that this is like a computer trying innumerable solutions to the problem of whether competition or cooperation were more successful patterns for behavior.
Given that John Forbes Nash (the "beautiful mind" guy) showed that cooperation was the better pattern in game theory it is not surprising that such a "mindless" computer program would reach the same "conclusion" through brute computations.
He got a nobel prize for it too.
Nash equilibrium - Wikipedia
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-06-2006 8:46 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024