Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 51 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,195 Year: 5,452/9,624 Month: 477/323 Week: 117/204 Day: 17/16 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution Logic
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17853
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.9


Message 258 of 302 (320447)
06-11-2006 7:57 AM
Reply to: Message 249 by Someone who cares
06-11-2006 12:38 AM


Why embarrass yourself ?
quote:
Let me add an "Or."
Or the author has challenged many evolutionists in several forums to provide undebatable evidence directly in support of evolution, and they couldn't. And he did MUCH research, from MANY sources, and found that the evidence is actually against evolution. Thus he came to the conclusions that he did.
I've looked at your essay. It's obvious that that isn't what happened. It's obvious that the author did virtually no valid research. So why even suggest otherwise ?
If you don't know that eusthenopteron, icthyostega, seymouria and archaeopteryx exist - fossil species that have been widely known for decades - then how can you claim to have done much research ? If you do know that they exist then why deny it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by Someone who cares, posted 06-11-2006 12:38 AM Someone who cares has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by Coragyps, posted 06-11-2006 11:59 AM PaulK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024