Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 50 (9181 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,283 Year: 5,540/9,624 Month: 565/323 Week: 62/143 Day: 5/19 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cyanobacteria weren't first, but last?
John
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 7 (21756)
11-07-2002 1:30 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by blitz77
11-07-2002 1:03 AM


quote:
Originally posted by blitz77:
This may be considered as further evidence against an early reducing atmosphere--because otherwise you would need some other organism to produce oxygen, and no other candidate has been put forward.
The article you linked-to in your post is discussing these other organisms.
Note that per the article cited, cyanobacteria are not the EARLIEST bacteria, but came along after the sulfer loving bacteria. It does not say that NO BACTERIA came before the cyanobacteria.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by blitz77, posted 11-07-2002 1:03 AM blitz77 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by blitz77, posted 11-07-2002 1:48 AM John has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024