Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,278 Year: 5,535/9,624 Month: 560/323 Week: 57/143 Day: 19/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Potential falsifications of the theory of evolution
ringo
Member (Idle past 530 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 39 of 968 (341382)
08-19-2006 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Ephraim7
08-19-2006 12:10 PM


Re: Evolution vs. the Observations of Moses
Ephraim7 writes:
What Genesis does give us is what we will call the Observations of Moses (OM).
Just out of curiosity, what do you think of the Observations of Long John Silver?
And what do you suppose they have to do with evolution?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Ephraim7, posted 08-19-2006 12:10 PM Ephraim7 has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 530 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 402 of 968 (600120)
01-12-2011 4:31 PM
Reply to: Message 394 by ICANT
01-12-2011 12:17 PM


ICANT writes:
As I look at the so called tree of life many of the limbs and branches are missing.
That seems like an intellectually dishonest approach. You look at a tree, notice that some branches are missing and decide that it's therefore not a tree? Surely it's the branches that are connected that make a tree a tree.

"I'm Rory Bellows, I tell you! And I got a lot of corroborating evidence... over here... by the throttle!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 394 by ICANT, posted 01-12-2011 12:17 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024