Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Theory of Evolution
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 63 (18888)
10-02-2002 5:24 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 5:06 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--Careful with your attitude, it would not be a complement if I confused you with nos.

Flattery will get you nowhere.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:06 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:54 PM nos482 has replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 63 (18889)
10-02-2002 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 5:10 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"What was "vague" about the question? All you have to do is say is how creationism works. "
--The methodology of creationism? Since you have asked this on an individual level, I simply see that, IMO, creationism implies theism. There are no more details other than that. If you'd like to go more in depth and see what I think about a specific finding and what it indicates about the history of the earth, life, solar system, etc. Delve deeper.

In other words "Puff, god did it!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:10 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:56 PM nos482 has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 63 (18893)
10-02-2002 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nos482
10-02-2002 5:24 PM


"Flattery will get you nowhere."
--Nowhere? well at least that is a step further from where your going... Respect is one element that will get you a serious and credible conversation.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 5:24 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:00 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 63 (18894)
10-02-2002 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by nos482
10-02-2002 5:25 PM


"In other words "Puff, god did it!"
--The only place your going to get anything of that sort is the origin of the universe...but of course you would say that 'puff' I dunno how it happened but it still went 'puff'. Ask serious questions, your likely to get serious answers. Ask sarcastic questions, your likely to get sarcastic answers.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 10-02-2002]
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 10-02-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 5:25 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:01 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 63 (18904)
10-02-2002 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 5:54 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"Flattery will get you nowhere."
--Nowhere? well at least that is a step further from where your going... Respect is one element that will get you a serious and credible conversation.

Respect is earned not demanded. I only have to respect your right to state your opinions and beliefs, I don't have to respect the opinion or belief itself. I wouldn't demand that you be banned for stating them.
[This message has been edited by nos482, 10-02-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:54 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 7:03 PM nos482 has replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 63 (18905)
10-02-2002 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 5:56 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"In other words "Puff, god did it!"
--The only place your going to get anything of that sort is the origin of the universe...but of course you would say that 'puff' I dunno how it happened but it still went 'puff'. Ask serious questions, your likely to get serious answers. Ask sarcastic questions, your likely to get sarcastic answers.

As I've said before, it is better to be a smartass than a dumbass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 5:56 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 7:05 PM nos482 has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 63 (18906)
10-02-2002 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by nos482
10-02-2002 7:00 PM


"Respect is earned not demanded."
--Respect is 'required' for you to have any take in formal, credible discussion with me.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:00 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:13 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 63 (18907)
10-02-2002 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by nos482
10-02-2002 7:01 PM


"As I've said before, it is better to be a smartass than a dumbass."
--You are being both.. Do you listen to any of your fellows in this forum? They don't enjoy your attitude either.. Good explanation for why you don't get anywhere in your 'debates'.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:01 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:15 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 63 (18910)
10-02-2002 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 7:03 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"Respect is earned not demanded."
--Respect is 'required' for you to have any take in formal, credible discussion with me.

You don't have any respect for my intelligence if you expect me to accept creationism as anything other than religiously inspired pseudo-science. So how do you expect me to have any respect for you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 7:03 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 11:02 PM nos482 has replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 63 (18911)
10-02-2002 7:15 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 7:05 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"As I've said before, it is better to be a smartass than a dumbass."
--You are being both.. Do you listen to any of your fellows in this forum? They don't enjoy your attitude either.. Good explanation for why you don't get anywhere in your 'debates'.

And what, you're just an ass?
It is only one of them and he doesn't count. And I get what I want out of my debates.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 7:05 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 10:54 PM nos482 has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 63 (18935)
10-02-2002 10:54 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by nos482
10-02-2002 7:15 PM


"And what, you're just an ass?
It is only one of them and he doesn't count. And I get what I want out of my debates."
--What you are getting is not positive response..so unless you have some odd mental inversion with the concept, then I'd say your being here is not appealing.
--You have yet to show that you are even capable of carrying on a discussion of any set of data.
--I don't know why I put up with you, I guess I just feel a hint of sympothy for the intellectually impaired.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:15 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by nos482, posted 10-03-2002 8:33 AM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 63 (18936)
10-02-2002 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by nos482
10-02-2002 7:13 PM


"You don't have any respect for my intelligence if you expect me to accept creationism as anything other than religiously inspired pseudo-science."
--'Creationism' isn't even a topic of debate in science, it has nothing to do with science! I have not made this assertion, this again shows your lack in knowledge for what you are dealing with when you struggle discussion with me.
"So how do you expect me to have any respect for you?"
--Knowing your prejudice, this question is fully contradictory toward your actions and carries a non-existence of potential merit. The sophistry you have displayed is worthless repugnant jargon.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by nos482, posted 10-02-2002 7:13 PM nos482 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by nos482, posted 10-03-2002 8:37 AM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5903 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 58 of 63 (18952)
10-03-2002 2:21 AM


I'd like to request that everyone calm the hell down, take a step back, breathe deeply, and quit with the ad homs? We're not adding anything to the discussion, here. Thanks.

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Adminnemooseus, posted 10-03-2002 2:35 AM Quetzal has not replied
 Message 62 by TrueCreation, posted 10-03-2002 4:36 PM Quetzal has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 59 of 63 (18953)
10-03-2002 2:35 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Quetzal
10-03-2002 2:21 AM


State of topic discussion noted - Door now found to be creaking towards "closed" - Will the movement of the door be stopped? - Only time will tell.
Adminnemooseus
------------------
{mnmoose@lakenet.com}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 10-03-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Quetzal, posted 10-03-2002 2:21 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
nos482
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 63 (18975)
10-03-2002 8:33 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by TrueCreation
10-02-2002 10:54 PM


Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--What you are getting is not positive response..so unless you have some odd mental inversion with the concept, then I'd say your being here is not appealing.
This was never a popularity contest.
--You have yet to show that you are even capable of carrying on a discussion of any set of data.
Why bother, you won't accept any valid science, only your pseudo-science.
--I don't know why I put up with you, I guess I just feel a hint of sympothy for the intellectually impaired.
It's called self-pity, in your case. You shouldn't project.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by TrueCreation, posted 10-02-2002 10:54 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024