|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 58 (9189 total) |
| |
Michaeladams | |
Total: 918,911 Year: 6,168/9,624 Month: 16/240 Week: 31/34 Day: 3/6 Hour: 2/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Could this really have happened? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
Why would the Philistines connect Nazarite, a priestly class, with warrior? What was the tradition that Nazarites were powerful?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 600 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
jar writes: Why would the Philistines connect Nazarite, a priestly class, with warrior? Beats me. How much do most of us know about Osama bin Laden? We demonize the "bad guys" and exaggerate their powers, but how well do we really know them? Whether or not the Philistines even knew what a Nazarite was, Samson was just the "bad guy" to them - the terrorst. One would expect an overreaction from their Department of Homeland Security, not an underreaction. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Sorry but that is even funnier than Birth Hair. Yes, killing folk is coming into contact with dead people. No it's not funny. What is meant exactly by the expression "coming into contact with dead people?" Why does the bible contradict itself so blatently in this regard? When you strike someone down, they are not dead yet. They live on long enough for you to leave, and not actually come into contact with them.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
You know, this thread has become so comical to me. I am beyond fustrated. Many times I have discussions here on these forums, and I am not sure about things, so when people present their cases, I either back down, or educate myself to the correct answer. Message 24 This thread has been nothing but one misunderstanding after another. It's like you say blue, and I say black, then brenna says 9, and jar says 12, all ringo says is no, no,no, and it's all supposed to mean something?
RR: It's what they believed, what they did, and what happened. What's the problem? According to the story, not my belief's. I have stated my belief's several times already. And when I refer to "what happened" that was refering to samson having hair, and not having power. Just like the Philistines thought would happen (ACCORDING TO THE STORY) quote:Message 35 quote: Message 85quote: You would do best if you stuck to your own topic, and not go off-topic about what I believe in. You asked the question is this plausible (not possible)Then asked the question "why would the Philistines let his hair grow back" as if to give cause to the reason that a very important thing was over looked in the story, and that is what makes it not plausible. But as we study the story, we find out by examining the facts (of the story) that the Philistines were perfectly logical in letting his hair grow back. So that puts to death your reasoning for making the story unplausible. You can start another thread and examine another reason if you want.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 5.0 |
Why does the bible contradict itself so blatently in this regard? Because it is a plot device riVeRraT. It's the same reason that the folk in the movies open the door that the monster is behind, or race in their cars to save someone instead of picking up the phone. All the contradictions are in there because they made the story more interesting. That's all. They take advantage of the audience willing suspension of logic and credibility. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 4116 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
i quite agree with you that it's a ridiculous story, but it is consistent with itself.
he had to repent of i suppose letting someone get close enough to him that he would let his secret go. i have no idea. i always thought it was silly. nazirites are odd. but that's where people get a bunch of bizarre ideas about jesus. they think he was a nazirite (one of a vow) instead of a nazarene (one from nazareth).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
If the strength wasn't in the hair, why did Samson say it was? Why didn’t he say that the LORD will strengthen me as long as I don’t cut my hair? That is exactly what he told her. He said he was a Nazirite from birth. If you cut your hair, you are no longer a Nazirite. When i said to you earlier "the strength is in the hair dude" I was just making light of it. I hope you didn't take that seriously.
then why did Samson not say that his strength was in the LORD? When you say your a Nazirite, you are with the Lord.
If God would only strengthen Samson if he kept the long hair, a sign of a Nazarite, then why didn’t God leave him when he broke any other Nazarite vow? I am not sure he broke any other vows.We can discuss it. Remember I told you, I am not some kind of bible expert or a literalist. I am learning as we go. I have a pretty good knowledge, but far from being an expert. If the strength wasn't in his hair then how did he manage to carry off the huge city gates and take them all the way to the top of the hill? Isn't this part of another story?
quote: quote: After reading that I don't know. To me it doesn't sound plausible, or if it did happen, then all the information is not there, and many details are left out as to why.
Well, I think this is where your logic breaks down. If he drew his strength from the LORD, then why would he not pray to God to strengthen him before the Philistines put him in jail and then gouged his eyes out? Why didn't he pray to Yahweh when he was on the way to jail, slaughter the Philistines, and escape? If God would only strengthen Samson when his hair grew back then it just highlights that the ”Birth Hair’ argument is flawed! Irrelevant, in the story he did not call out to God, until the end, and that is when God restored his power. To ask the question, why didn't he pray before is silly, because we know when he prayed. note: it is not necessary to have your "birth hair" to be a Nazirite, or to be right with God, but it was a symbol for Samson. He was a special Nazirite to save Israel. But he blew it. So the bad in his life led him back to God. I can understand that. I find God in it.
If the LORD wouldn't strengthen Samson until his hair was long, I never said anything to that effect.I said the opposite, explaining that verse where his hair grows back, but he does not have power. Now, AS FAR AS YOU are concerned the strength MUST have been in his hair because now the hair has gone he has no superhuman strength. The hair that had never been cut from birth. As far as I am concerned, he will never have that hair again, he will have to grow new hair, which will not have been on his head from birth.
This is the crux of the argument, if the Philistines believed that a long haired Samson is extremely dangerous, why would they have allowed his hair to grow back? I think that this possibility is so absurd, that it is a very good reason for rejecting the historicity of this particular event, it reeks of folk lore. Like thirty times now, I have shown a way around this. The Philistines did not just think it was his hair, period. They thought it was because he was never shaven from birth. 17 He told her all his heart, and said to her, "No razor has ever come on my head; for I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother's womb. If I am shaved, then my strength will go from me, and I will become weak, and be like any other man." I think I pasted that verse several times now. They go together, those 2 sentences, in one verse, to explain where his power came from, and what the Philistines thought about his power. You cannot ignore certain words of the verse to suite your arguement.
I see your argument, but there are verses where he carries out superhuman feats and God isn't mentioned, so there is at least a POSSIBILITY that he can be superhuman without God. I don't think so, because he is Nazirite from birth. He is always with the Lord. I do think that many details are left out. He wasn't a Nazirite by choice, like other Nazirites. It was a gift from God to be that way, and he destroyed that gift. I think only John the Baptist was the other Nazirite from birth.He posessed a special gift also. All I can do is present to you the text that mentions a superhuman Samson without the power of God upon him, if you choose to add to the text then that's up to you. Am I adding to the text by pointing out that he was a Nazirite from birth, so he is always with the Lord?
Were several different authors involved, were certain words or phrases added later, can we see any obvious disjointed passages, why was God absent from some superhuman events, can we place Samson into a real historical context, does the story contain any etiologies, anachronisms, and so on? Have you ever wondered what God was trying to teach us through this story?
I don't know about anyone else but that would drive me mad, how can anyone just be happy to research the Bible in such a way. I am not saying anyone here has this approach; I am speaking in general terms. It's good to nit-pick, but don't let it drive you mad. Instead ask God yourself what is meant by it. It's only a small piece of a very large puzzle. Do you believe in God?
If it is then why would God abandon Samson when he gets his head shaved but not abandon him when he breaks countless other Nazarite vows? That was the specific vow mentioned by the angel, not the other 2. There are only 3 vows to voluntary become a Nazirite.Samson was not a Nazirite voluntarily. He had a purpose in life to save Israel. If the bible is telling us this story, and Samson is breaking vows, then it must have been meant for him only. It was plainly obvious what a Nazirite was, and how he was supposed to behave. It would be like me telling you 2+2=5, right after I told you the answer was 4. Samson was different that other Nazirites.
quote: It says, ”if my head was shaved, my strength would leave me’. Wouldn’t it make more sense to think that if his head wasn’t shaved then his strength would return? Not really since he was 1 of only 2 people to be a Nazirite from birth. The other had not been born yet.
Samson did not say his strength would leave him forever, so how would the Philistines know? Because it was his "birth hair" that they were concerned about (chuckle) Remember to, they believed that their god had delivered Samson to them. So they were victorious. Samson's power was gone for good.
Makes perfect sense, because the power was indeed gone, even though his hair grew back. The power returned when his hair was long! When it was long, or when it was long AND he reconciled with God?Which one is more important? Well, I had a class of 25 sixteen and seventeen year olds who concluded exactly the same as I did, that the Philistines could not have been that dumb, therefore it is a good reason to reject the historicity of this particular narrative. But you taught them to believe this. Did you even mention my arguement at all? It was probably in your presentation. And thank you, you just provided proof of what I said in another thread, that our education system is down playing the bible, and leading our children into a state of dis-belief.
As far as they were concerned it came from his hair. Samson even said that, so why would they go getting al deep and philosophical about it when it is a very explicit claim? Deep and philosophical? 17 He told her all his heart, and said to her, "No razor has ever come on my head; for I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother's womb. If I am shaved, then my strength will go from me, and I will become weak, and be like any other man." There very little to get philosophical about in that verse. Ther are maybe but a few points. 1 all his heart (he meant it)2 No razor has ever come on my head(that means he had the same hair from birth) 3 for I have been (because) 4 a Nazirite to God from my mothers womb ( he was with God from the womb) 5 If I am shaved, then my strength will go from me, and I will become weak, and be like any other man." (in other words, he will blow it, all those years without shaving his head, he can never get that back, he will never be that special Nazirite again) Pretty straight forward.
Yes, and they believed Samson’s power was in his hair, it was what they were told by Delilah. That's not all they were told, why leave it out?
3 because he did not regain his strength after it grew back. How else did he pull down Dagon’s temple? By reconciling with God.
It is just one piece of evidence, the entire tale of Samson (from chaps. 13-16) is rife with illogical statements. Or, your not interpreting it correctly. The notes in the quote boxes were from this page:Judges 16:1 One day Samson went to Gaza, where he saw a prostitute and went in to spend the night with her.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1532 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
they think he was a nazirite (one of a vow) instead of a nazarene (one from nazareth). well, jesus obviously wasn't a nazarite (at least during his recorded adult life), as he he broke two of the three vows.
quote: turning water into wine kind of breaks that vow.
quote: and raising the dead kind of breaks that vow, too. however. the meaning "nazarene" is actually uncertain. one of the wonders of greek transliterations. in modern hebrew, nazareth is spelled (natserat) though it's possible that time has just mangled the spelling and it's root is the same as — (nazir -- nazarite), — (nazar) meaning "separated" or "consecreated" or "guarded." the root current spelling of nazareth is (natsar) which means "branch." that of course has religious implications as well -- but branches and separation are similar ideas. however, i suspect it's a pun that simply got lost somewhere. in modern hebrew, the person might be — (nazari), and the vows might be described with an adjective like — (nazarit), which sounds a lot like "nazaret." and indeed, it'd be spelled the same way save for a vowel or two. (who uses vowels?) the city was, apparently, originally called "nazara" which brings it even closer to the biblical usage of — (nazir) and it's root nazar for nazarites. in other words, i think it's matthew thumbing his nose at christians. it's sort of like saying "i want a hamburger" and getting a person from hamburg. Edited by arachnophilia, : clarity. also, see the wikipedia article: Nazarene - Wikipedia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Let me try and explain this another way.
17 He told her all his heart, and said to her, "No razor has ever come on my head; for I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother's womb. If I am shaved, then my strength will go from me, and I will become weak, and be like any other man." His exact words were, if I am shaved, my strength will go from me.He mentions nothing about the power being in his hair or not. He got shaved, lost his power, and that was it. As far as the Philistines were concerned.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1532 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
If you cut your hair, you are no longer a Nazirite. uh, maybe. if you do, you've either broken your vows, or you're at the end of your separation. or, actually, there's a third possibility:
quote: you shave your head, but then go back to growing your hair. so it doesn't neccessarily stop you from being a nazarite. but when you DO complete the separation, the hair itself is an offering to the lord:
quote: I think only John the Baptist was the other Nazirite from birth. i'm not 100% sure of that, but it sounds very reasonable. j-b does seem to match the ideas, though a little more extreme. he, too, eventually gets a haircut. though a bit more drastic of one... but being a nazarite from birth is a little abnormal. normally, it's for a set period of time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 604 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Busted!
I could have wrote that diferrently, since I guess i didn't mean it that way. It could have been God. How's that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 4116 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
well, jesus obviously wasn't a nazarite (at least during his recorded adult life), as he he broke two of the three vows. you and i know this, but most people....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ReverendDG Member (Idle past 4299 days) Posts: 1119 From: Topeka,kansas Joined: |
I guess your reading comnprehension is low.
it doesn't look like you really read the OP, how are the stories plausable?as i said they are just like folk stories of all religions and like any of those, are not plausable Please point out in this thread where I make an assertion that this story is true.
where did i say that i was talking about you?, aor are you just assuming that because i posted to you?i would say you are trying to find consistancy in your mind for some stories that have none Please find the line where I express how I feel about the story.
i guess seeing you flail at people for not agreeing with you isn't telling me how you feel about it?
What is the topic?
the plausabilty of these two stories? i think they have been shown to be nothing but stories - i mean come on a guy killing people with a jaw bone? thats immpossible - sounds like a folk myth to me, read a lot of those from other cultures
Until today, I used to think that everyone in EVC was smart
oohh i can play the insults too! if this is what you think now stop looking in the mirror
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ReverendDG Member (Idle past 4299 days) Posts: 1119 From: Topeka,kansas Joined: |
you and i know this, but most people....
its sort of like the fact that nazerith didn't exist till 100 ad or so?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
macaroniandcheese  Suspended Member (Idle past 4116 days) Posts: 4258 Joined: |
awesome. the bible lies again?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024