Controversial claim #1:
There could have been any number of lines previous to the one that exists now.
You are perhaps the only person in the world who sees anything controversial there.
See the scientific method in my previous post and the problems associated with this claim.
In my opinion, that a simplistic view of the scientific method. But I won't press that point, since it is off topic for this thread. Even given that version of the scientific method, there is nothing controvsial in the listed claim. I'll suggest that you are misapplying those rules.
Controversial Claim #2:
Homology between genomes is not evidence of common descent.
I can't comment on that one. I haven't been following this thread closely enough to have noticed that RAZD made such a claim. If you can provide a reference to the particular message, I'll look more closely.