Well, actually.... it should have said:
"But... the fact is that there are approximately 30 thousand different known proteins based upon the specified arrangement of 20 different amino acid sub units (the number of sub units varying from hundreds to thousands depending on the protein being constructed). The order (and possibly the relative position) of the sub-units is based upon the arrangement four chemical digits code in the DNA."
So instead of just something stupid or disingenuous it should have been something irrelevant to start off with and then the same stupid/disingenuous elision? Well, its your sentence. Maybe when you were dotting the 'T's you shouldn't have had your 'I's crossed.*I'm sorry*.
Funnily enough the sort of high level protein structure we are talking about her includes structural levels up to the quaternary.
What is specified by DNA is the primary structure of the amino acids, i.e. which one comes next in the polypeptide sequence. The higher levels are the secondary, which covers the various basic structural fold and loop elements of protein conformation, the tertiary, which is the exact spatial form the protein will take and includes the sort of residue and atomic positional relationships you mentioned. The quaternay structure is the way several seperate polypeptide products can combine to produce larger functional proteins, i.e. the way 4 haeme bearing subunits combine in haemoglobin.
But all of these higher levels and other modifications of the protein are based at root upon its primary structure. In fact it is almost as if the chemical characteristics of the amino acids in that primary structure encode information for the way the peptides should be folded in the cell to make a functional protein, now what does that remind me of.
TTFN,
WK