The "Digital Code" of DNA

And words are meaningless unless we apply a meaning to them in the same way that the DNA "code" is meaningless until we apply a meaning to it.The function of the code is independent of any "meaning" because its all just chemistry. There is no "code" necessary.

You are when you're calling it a digital code. A code without meaning is no longer a code. My point still stands. Well, at least you're admitting that the code is unecessary. Consider yourself refuted. Oh, wait... maybe you're not.btw: There is NO digital genetic code and it is NOT necessary.Wow, that's a fun game.How about instead of just stating crap, you actually support it?

But they are based on the same chemical principles like every other chemical that exists. There isn't anything about DNA that makes it excluded from chemical principles.And quartz crystals have no "codes" that specify structure because WE haven't defined the codes as such. The only thing that makes DNA different is that we've labeled and defined the "code". But that is something that we have added on, it isn't intrinsic to the property of DNA like you seem to think it is.

That's what I'm sayin'.Why can Hoot not understand this? Is he just being disingenuous?