Author
|
Topic: Evolution in the VERY beginning
|
bkelly
Inactive Member
|
Re: "living" is difficult to define
My understanding of the non-living definition is that a virus does not metabolize. I read that replicating molecules have been found, but they clearly do not merit the definition of life.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 43 by Chiroptera, posted 10-02-2005 1:49 PM | | Chiroptera has not replied |
|
Chiroptera
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 47 of 58 (248211)
10-02-2005 2:21 PM
|
Reply to: Message 44 by AdminNosy 10-02-2005 1:57 PM
|
|
Re: Topic?
Sorry, you are right, this is off-topic. As far as a new thread goes, I'm not sure whether there is much more to be said; it seems that these last few posts demonstrate that it is a tricky business to define "life".
This message is a reply to: | | Message 44 by AdminNosy, posted 10-02-2005 1:57 PM | | AdminNosy has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
Message 48 of 58 (248218)
10-02-2005 2:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 44 by AdminNosy 10-02-2005 1:57 PM
|
|
New Topic?
It is also a vital part of the argument, otherwise how do we know when we have reached the conclusion? We already have replicating molecules, self catalysing peptides and viruses, but they need a certain environment to operate within: is it the environment (protocell) that becomes alive? Let me see what I have in my bag of tricks to start a new topic. we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 44 by AdminNosy, posted 10-02-2005 1:57 PM | | AdminNosy has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 49 by Matt P, posted 10-03-2005 2:13 PM | | RAZD has replied |
|
Matt P
Member (Idle past 4803 days) Posts: 106 From: Tampa FL Joined: 03-18-2005
|
|
Message 49 of 58 (248568)
10-03-2005 2:13 PM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by RAZD 10-02-2005 2:35 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
Hi RAZD, I've noticed your PNT. I've done a bit of research in this field recently, and thought I'd bring it to your attention. My studies are currently on the formation of organophosphorus species (DNA consists of three pieces- a nucleobase, a deoxy-ribose sugar, and a phosphate bridge) and their biological relevance. A press release can be found here: Geotimes - November 2004 - Impacting the origin of life and our paper is in the journal Astrobiology, number 5(4). Enjoy!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 48 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2005 2:35 PM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 50 by RAZD, posted 10-03-2005 9:07 PM | | Matt P has replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
Message 50 of 58 (248710)
10-03-2005 9:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 49 by Matt P 10-03-2005 2:13 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
Thanks, I hope to revise it into a more logical format. This will certainly fit in the references (I've bookmarked it) ... thanks Murchison
This message is a reply to: | | Message 49 by Matt P, posted 10-03-2005 2:13 PM | | Matt P has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 55 by Matt P, posted 12-13-2005 1:33 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
|
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: 12-09-2001
|
|
Message 51 of 58 (251921)
10-15-2005 5:27 AM
|
Reply to: Message 10 by david12 09-28-2005 11:51 PM
|
|
Re: origins of life
quote: When counting, you start at 0.
Actually, when counting, I start at 1.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 10 by david12, posted 09-28-2005 11:51 PM | | david12 has not replied |
|
Chiroptera
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 52 of 58 (251974)
10-15-2005 12:49 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by nator 10-15-2005 5:27 AM
|
|
Really, really bad math joke.
That would depend on whether you are Peano or Zermelo and Frankel.
"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt
This message is a reply to: | | Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2005 5:27 AM | | nator has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
Message 53 of 58 (251976)
10-15-2005 12:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by nator 10-15-2005 5:27 AM
|
|
Re: origins of life
the instant before you have 1 you have zero.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2005 5:27 AM | | nator has not replied |
|
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: 03-20-2003
|
|
Message 54 of 58 (251982)
10-15-2005 12:59 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by nator 10-15-2005 5:27 AM
|
|
Re: origins of life
Actually, when counting, I start at 1. That's because you're not a computer programmer. You probably always count the wrong number of fenceposts, too.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2005 5:27 AM | | nator has not replied |
|
Matt P
Member (Idle past 4803 days) Posts: 106 From: Tampa FL Joined: 03-18-2005
|
|
Message 55 of 58 (268817)
12-13-2005 1:33 PM
|
Reply to: Message 50 by RAZD 10-03-2005 9:07 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
Hi RAZD- have you made any progress on your Origins of life article? I have a few comments, but was wondering if you've finished yet.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 50 by RAZD, posted 10-03-2005 9:07 PM | | RAZD has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 56 by nwr, posted 12-13-2005 2:02 PM | | Matt P has replied |
|
nwr
Member Posts: 6412 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: 08-08-2005 Member Rating: 4.5
|
|
Message 56 of 58 (268827)
12-13-2005 2:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by Matt P 12-13-2005 1:33 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
Hi RAZD- have you made any progress on your Origins of life article? I have a few comments, but was wondering if you've finished yet.
RAZD - Building Blocks of Life
This message is a reply to: | | Message 55 by Matt P, posted 12-13-2005 1:33 PM | | Matt P has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 57 by Matt P, posted 12-13-2005 2:03 PM | | nwr has not replied |
|
Matt P
Member (Idle past 4803 days) Posts: 106 From: Tampa FL Joined: 03-18-2005
|
|
Message 57 of 58 (268829)
12-13-2005 2:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 56 by nwr 12-13-2005 2:02 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
AH! Thanks, I had missed that.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 56 by nwr, posted 12-13-2005 2:02 PM | | nwr has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 58 by RAZD, posted 12-14-2005 10:34 PM | | Matt P has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
Message 58 of 58 (269508)
12-14-2005 10:34 PM
|
Reply to: Message 57 by Matt P 12-13-2005 2:03 PM
|
|
Re: New Topic?
and thanks for asking!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 57 by Matt P, posted 12-13-2005 2:03 PM | | Matt P has not replied |
|