Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Inerrant Bible Manuscripts?
Force
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 67 (472141)
06-20-2008 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by IamJoseph
06-20-2008 8:54 AM


IAJ,
IAJ writes:
What's your point? Everything comes from other sources - including said divine inspirational writings. The vital factor is what is being said, it is historically vindicated, and does it stand up to today's knowledge and to the factor of truth.
While there is hardly any verification of most bibles and scriptures of their origins, I found no negating factors of the OT. IOW, there is no contradictory, contemporary writings of disputation - which is not the case with the NT and Quran.
The point is that the manuscripts in the Bible, even the Torah, are errant. In regards to the Torah there are differences and disputations in it. Earlier in this thread Brian pointed out some of those differences.
http://EvC Forum: Inerrant Bible Manuscripts? -->EvC Forum: Inerrant Bible Manuscripts?
IAJ writes:
Better than where it comes from, is what is its value. Even Einstein applied other sources - yet his writings were profound.
The scriptures in the Bible are still errant.
Edited by Force, : edit
Edited by Force, : restart
Edited by Force, : edit - grammar

Thanks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by IamJoseph, posted 06-20-2008 8:54 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by IamJoseph, posted 06-20-2008 10:01 PM Force has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 62 of 67 (472182)
06-20-2008 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Force
06-20-2008 4:17 PM


quote:
it appears you are going back to claiming WAS.
I am going to IS - via the only path possible. You are making conclusions backwards - by restrospectively alligning the WAS to your own IS.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Force, posted 06-20-2008 4:17 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Force, posted 07-04-2008 12:29 PM IamJoseph has not replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5733 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 63 of 67 (473380)
06-28-2008 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by IamJoseph
06-20-2008 2:56 AM


Re: Aleph/B; "He Is Gods of Israel"
Quote: "Plural and God do not go hand in hand in OT."
1) "He Is Gods" - Genesis 2.4. MYHLA HWHY.
2) "He Is Gods of fathers you" - over 100 times; MKYTBA YHLA HWHY.
3) "He Is Gods of you" - Ex 34.24; KYHLA HWHY.
4) "He Is Gods of Israel" - Jer 11.3; LARSY YHLA HWHY.
A) "to God (Singular)"; Gen 14.18: LAL = God (LA) + to (L).
B) "God" (Singular)": Gen 14.20; Gen 14.20.
C) "He Is God most high (Singular): Gen 14.22: NWYL' LA HWHY.
D) "I God almighty" (Singular): Gen 17.1: YDS LA YNA.
So then, in the Hebrew "Gods" was plural 6,400 times; and --
"God" was singular 395 times.
Added to this, "gods" referred to pagan "gods" (MYHLA) 220 times.
Therefore, LA does not equal MYHLA; and --
MYHLA does not equal LA.
And so, the Jews are liars!
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by IamJoseph, posted 06-20-2008 2:56 AM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 9:03 PM sl33w has replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5733 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 64 of 67 (473382)
06-28-2008 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Force
06-15-2008 4:55 PM


Re: Force
See reply to IamJoseph about 6,400 records of plural "Gods" (MYHLA) and 395 records of singular "God" (LA).
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Force, posted 06-15-2008 4:55 PM Force has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 65 of 67 (473398)
06-28-2008 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by sl33w
06-28-2008 5:02 PM


Re: Aleph/B; "He Is Gods of Israel"
That is an indication you don't understand the OT or history.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by sl33w, posted 06-28-2008 5:02 PM sl33w has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by sl33w, posted 06-30-2008 1:54 PM IamJoseph has not replied

  
sl33w
Member (Idle past 5733 days)
Posts: 53
Joined: 05-23-2008


Message 66 of 67 (473537)
06-30-2008 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by IamJoseph
06-28-2008 9:03 PM


Re: Aleph/B; "He Is Gods of Israel"
Quote: "This is an indication that you do not understand history or the OT."
1) Barnabas, in the second century, wrote, "The creation was about 4,000 years before Christ."
2) Bishop Ussher, in the 1300s, wrote, "Creation was exactly 4,000 years before Christ; or, in 4,004 BC."
3) Sid Williams has the chronology from the "Beginning of Time; Genesis, Chapter 5 (and not, "the creatioin"), in 4,148 BC to Revival 2015.
4) Sid Williams has comentaries on: The Parable of Creation, Ecclesiastes, Eze 38 & 39, Joel, Isaiah 11, Daniel, Chapters 7 & 12 (1335 Days: 1258 BC - AD 77).
5) None of these great works are necessary to write my book, "The First Hebrew Manual Without Vowels Points."
6) I am the Lexicographer of the Hebrew.
sl33w

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by IamJoseph, posted 06-28-2008 9:03 PM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Force
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 67 (474008)
07-04-2008 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by IamJoseph
06-20-2008 10:01 PM


IAJ,
I restarted my post 61.
http://EvC Forum: Inerrant Bible Manuscripts? -->EvC Forum: Inerrant Bible Manuscripts?

Thanks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by IamJoseph, posted 06-20-2008 10:01 PM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024