|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Noah's Ark | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 661 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
You really didn't answer the question at all. If there were 2000 to 16000 "kinds" on the ark, what were those "kinds"? Where is the list? Why can't YECs even define what a "kind" is?
Carolus Linnaeus... tried to determine the created kinds. He defined a ”species’ as a group of organisms that could interbreed among themselves, but not with another group, akin to the Genesis concept. But a "kind" is decidedly not a species. There are far more than 16000 species.
So, on the ark, there would be 2 canines, 2 felines, 2 equines, 2 ursines, 7 sheep, 7 goats.... But "canines", "felines", "equines", etc. are not species as Linnaeus classified them. If there is a feline "kind", define it. What characteristics does a "feline" have that distinguishes it from every other "kind"? And where is the evidence? Where are the fossils of that first "feline", from which descended lions, tigers, housecats, etc.? And why are sheep and goats separate "kinds"? Wouldn't it be easier to "microevolve" sheep and goats from the same ancestor than to "microevolve" rats and mice from the came ancestor?
... 2 baby diplodocid dinosaurs, 2 baby large carnivorous dinosaurs similar to T-rexes, ect. Babies? Where does the Bible say anything about babies? That's just something that YECs made up to explain away the size problem. It has no basis either in science or the Bible. And what were dinosaurs doing on the ark anyway? Why save then from the flood only to have them go extinct five minutes later anyway? As you can see, the YEC scenario raises far more questions than it answers. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yaro Member (Idle past 6745 days) Posts: 1797 Joined: |
Isaiah 40:22 (that book was written many centuries before the time of Christ) talks about the sphericity of the earth. Also, in Job 26:7 ”He suspends the Earth over nothing’. So, you say they believed in a flat earth supported by pillars, yet the account written by “Those Ancients” refutes that theory. quote: Circle? And that says sphere.... how? If it's a sphere... then how can god spread the heavens out like a tent? A circle... with a tent on top... Sounds alot like this:
Job... let's read the whole passage:
quote: Note the bolded verses.... the ocean has bounds in the east and north? Aren't all the oceans interconected? I mean we are a sphere... why would the oceans have bounds unless it was on some sort of ... disc...
Ok, first, please refrain from swearing, it’s not polite. Second, Yes, the cataclysmic forces that were rpesent during the flood are mind boggling to think about. But they are not as far fetched as you would have people believe. Sorry if I swore. Not trying to. I really find it unbelivable that people go thrugh such great lengths to propose these ad hoc arguments. This is also why I am not going to address the following paragraphs. Why? Well, because the arguments you are proposing do nothing but attempt to twist evidence to fit a pre-supposed conclusion. I could do the same thing to prove to you that Icarus and Deadalus indeed built wax wings and flew away from their captors at Minos. I could do the same thing all the AiG boys are doing. I could call it Answers in Ovid. Fact is, NotSoBlind, is that the evidence simply does not point to a flood. And the ad hoc justifications provided at are at best impossible... at worst stupid, dishonest, outrageous, and embarassing. I mean they are! Think of the flood story? Would you belive it if it weren't in the bible? You don't belive Icarus do you? Why not? Why don't you belive Icarus? I can come up with similar tripe as Baumgardner to support Icarus. All the AiG type folks want to do is create a scenario, no matter how remote, that the flood just MAYBE may have happened. They think if they can do that, it will somehow keep their fantasy alive. Unfortunetly geology dosn't lie and the flood has been falsified for over 150 years. ... But I digress.... hey! I got one for you! What's a 'kind'? I'll give you an example, would moles be a kind? How about... ummm... dogs? Lemme know. I got some doozies for ya!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 984 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
The creationist scientist, Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778), the founder of the science of taxonomy,1 tried to determine the created kinds. He defined a ”species’ as a group of organisms that could interbreed among themselves, but not with another group, akin to the Genesis concept.
Oh, yeah, I remember! He's the one who classified the chimpanzee as Homo troglodydes in the first edition of his big book. He viewed chimps as so very similar to humans that he put them in the same genus.....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminAsgara Administrator (Idle past 2552 days) Posts: 2073 From: The Universe Joined: |
Hi NotSo,
Welcome to EvC. Around here we have a few Forum Guidelines that you agreed to follow when you joined. We find that these rules make the board run much smoother. Two of these are as follows:
6 Avoid lengthy cut-n-pastes. Introduce the point in your own words and provide a link to your source as a reference. If your source is not on-line you may contact the Site Administrator to have it made available on-line. 7 Never include material not your own without attribution to the original source.
Please give us your argument in your own words using links and short quotes as supporting evidence. Do not continue to cut and paste unattributed material or you will be suspended. Please direct any issues with this message to the appropriate thread linked in my signature box. AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 984 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
I could call it Answers in Ovid. yes, PUHLEEEEEZE!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6603 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
Don't forget the supervolcano explosions.
I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NotSoBlindFaith Inactive Junior Member |
Moles would be Talpidae (That in includes moles, mole shrews, and others). Dogs of course belong to the Canine family, along with wolves, foxes, dingoes, and African hunting dogs, all of which would come from a single pair of canines on the ark.
the pillars of the earth may design the princes of the world, the supreme rulers of it, and civil magistrates, who are sometimes called cornerstones, and the shields of the earth (Zech. 10:4, Ps 47:9) and so pillars, because they are the means of cementing, supporting, and protecting the people of the earth, and of preserving their peace and property. Likewise good men may be meant in a figurative sense, who, as they are the salt of the earth, are the pillars of it, for whose sake it was made, and is supported, and continued in being; the church is the pillar and ground of truth; and every good man is a pillar in the house of God, and especially ministers of the Gospel (see Rev. 3:12, 1Tim. 3:15, Gal 2:9, Pr 9:1). It is clear that, in context, the reference is to the noble ones, princes, not the physical Earth. Immediately before, the context is people, and immediately after the context is also about people. http://www.answersingenesis.org/...aq/docs/pillars_earth.asp As for boundaries of the oceans, that’s right in Genesis 1:6-7 “And God said, ”Let there be an expanse between the waters to separate water from water’ So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it.” Any guess’s what is being made? Also, you say there is no evidence for a worldwide flood. Please then, take your time and explain how, without a worldwide flood, there can be A: Fossil sea life on mountains, some found with fossils of land plants. B: How mass graves of dinosaurs exist all over the world, many of which even evolutionists say drown in a flood. C: How unfossilized dinosaur bones can still exist. If they died 65 million years ago, there bones should be ether completely fossilized or dust by now. D: How so many water carved features exist all over the globe (ex. Devils Tower, Columbia River basin, Grand canyon.) Oh, and be sure to go into detail. And, if the story of Noah’s Flood wasn’t in the bible, but I knew the geological information that I do now, I would still believe it. I can’t say I don’t believe in Noah’s Flood after taking geology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9011 From: Canada Joined: |
A: Fossil sea life on mountains, some found with fossils of land plants.
This was already explained to you. Did you read it?Now you explain the nature of that life. What sort of sea life is it? How is it related to todays sea life. Why is it like that? B: How mass graves of dinosaurs exist all over the world, many of which even evolutionists say drown in a flood.
Explain why this are not all of the same type. Why did they not all die at the same time? Explain why some are the result of water deposition but not others and why that water deposition is often river.
C: How unfossilized dinosaur bones can still exist. If they died 65 million years ago, there bones should be ether completely fossilized or dust by now. Teeth are already equivalent to minerals. What other bones of dinosaurs are not fossilized. As far as I know they are ALL permineralized. Give details.
D: How so many water carved features exist all over the globe (ex. Devils Tower, Columbia River basin, Grand canyon.) Oh, and be sure to go into detail. There are threads on these details. The details can not be explained by single flood. They did not all happen at the same time. There are such features from a wide range of times. Please explain, in detail, how this is done by one flood. ABE On second thought don't explain here. That is ALL off topic for this thread. Take it to "Geology and the Great Flood" threads. This message has been edited by NosyNed, 12-15-2005 11:23 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9011 From: Canada Joined: |
Moles would be Talpidae (That in includes moles, mole shrews, and others). Dogs of course belong to the Canine family, along with wolves, foxes, dingoes, and African hunting dogs, all of which would come from a single pair of canines on the ark. So, it appears from your examples that "kinds" are at about the family level. So you agree that our current animals that belong to one family all evolved (and very, very rapidly) from a single pair (or 7) at the time of the ark?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
1.7 million species at last check.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6603 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
I could probably do it but it's well past bedtime over here
Information:
Question: How many speciations per year is that? Don't forget to show your workings I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1593 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
( 1.7x106 - 16,000 ) / 5000 = 336.8
so roughly 337 (three hundred and THIRTY SEVEN?!?!?!?!) speciation events per year. did i get it right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9011 From: Canada Joined: |
I'd say pretty much at this simplified level. That is one a day!
However, it assumes a constant rate. That means that we were getting 1 a day in a population of about 30,000 some thousand individuals at the beginning. In addition, we have to put a stop to this hyper evolution long before today. So we have much less than 5,000 years to play with. For example, there is no hint in the Bible that this hadn't finished by the time of Christ. So we have about half as much time not the full 5,000 years. Earlier commentary in the OT also gives no hint that this was going on so it might be reasonable to presume that the rapid appearance of new life forms stopped sometime before.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nighttrain Member (Idle past 4243 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: |
Oops, sorry, Mangy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1593 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
oh over complicate things why don'tcha.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024