Noah's Ark

Don't know what the Leviathan is supposed to refer to, but the Behemoth is a bull elephant.

Of course, what they did not calcuate was the stress on a wooden vessel that size.It would split in half under it's own weight in the water.

There is no difference.. just like there is no difference between 'micro-evoltuion' and macro-evolution'.You need a new irony detector.

The predators ate the unicorns.

About those petrographs

quote:

---

The ones in Dinosaur National Park. There's some petroglyphs on a rock somewhere that creationalists claim to have come from the natives who lived there thousands of years ago. Never mind, of course, that Dinosaur National Park is one of the most fossil-laden areas found in the US and that over the past two hundred years there have probably been as many fossil-hunters in the area as scorpions. Also, you'd have to ignore the fact that the petroglyphs look almost exactly like what dinosaurs were thought to have looked like in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Even if the petroglyphs weren't a hoax, chances are they were just some fossil-hunters a hundred years ago who scratched some diagrams on a rock at night beside their campfire.

​

The creationalist websites I've seen list the petrographs as "Class C or Class D evidence", not to be repeated or used by creationalists in debates because of the weakness of the evidence.

---

YOu seem to confuse finding out about a new species with a new species forming.Such is life.

No, they did not. The Jewish people knew certain of the stories were allegories. Others not so much so.