Aliens and the Bible

I've been watching some documentaries on UFO's and have become aware of the reality of UFO's. As for the aliens, I thought I would propose this to the intelligent folks at the EvC.It seems that there is ample evidence for unmarked, unidentifiable aircraft.UFO Photos - UFO Evidence vallee_phys_tocHello! My Name Is 404 ‘However, the evidence for alien life is based on some perhaps sketchy hearsay and evidence.My position is thus: There are many planets in many solar systems in Jesus' vast creation that house life in abundance and perhaps they are without the filth of sin.So, here's why I think this.
In SCENES BEYOND THE GRAVE; VISIONS OF MARIETTA DAVIS an angel explains a view of the cosmos while on the way to the first heaven.
"'Behold,' said she, 'the countless, planetary hosts. Mark the rolling orbs, suns, and systems of suns, moving in silence and harmony. The vast expanse is occupied and peopled with universes, constructed in infinite wisdom. These are inhabited by holy beings, happy and immortal, though varied in degree of development and refined spirituality.'"Also I think maybe when it says "Sons of God" in the bible this might refer to these other creatures.
http://whatsaiththescripture.com/...bout.Marietta.Davis.htmlTell me what you guys think, and propose other reading material that correlates or contradicts this theory. Is their life on other planets and if so what are the implications?Please no rude arrogant remarks. Edited by Admin, : Fix links.

The hypotheses are great keep 'em coming!I noticed how no one has really entertained the idea of UFO's and read and experienced the links I have provided. This is classical evolutionary thought: If it sounds impossible, it is. Give no credence to that which is supernatural, etc.Please leave your religion at the door on this topic and focus on the implications of the parameters set forth.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jUGnspymZto Some of course have been around before the induction of the photoshop program. If it is flying saucers, that can move extremely fast as is documented , then it would be logical to assume that those who can defy the laws of physics and gravity must be relatively intelligent.Check this out:
404 Not Found

Well since you think so... No one is going to call Jon, from the government, and give you all the details. It is a matter of national security. Look into the Roswell incident.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...Air_Force_reports_on_the_Roswell_UFO_incidentAlso check this out:
NASA Photographs of Possible UFOs
The Best UFO Pictures Ever Taken, Page 10, Year-2007
The Best UFO Pictures Ever Taken, Page 9, Year-2006
The Best UFO Pictures Ever Taken, Page 8, Year-2005 You seem to think I care to hear opinions from folks you have probably never looked into the subject. Only speculated hypotheses from their world view humanistic ideology. Appealing to authority and popularity is a weak argument. My friend Tim says that aspartame is safe, his dad works for the FDA. Yep, you have established that your text book physics buddies like to think about aliens some times. The thing to note here is that you seem to believe they are some how right, because you seen them in uh textbook. They don't know squat about organisms on any planet and neither do you or I. I don't care how many PhD you have. I gave you links to photo's and movies, check them out. You seem to think alien life would think like you. Your arrogance is frightening and you are a hypocrite. In the view of Heaven given to and recited by Marietta Davis, for which the link referred, the reason these aliens don't acknowledge us is because they don't want to get the dirt (sin) on themselves. Chris Everard has a physical view and gives evidence of the United States shooting them down.
SecretSpaceDvd.com is for sale | HugeDomains Edited by Vashgun, : No reason given.Edited by Admin, : Shorten link.

Your opinion So one guy who is mind controlled speaks out his hypothesis. So what?
Page not found | Skeptical InquirerBrainwashing - Wikipedia
this article in itself is suspect, by mention of false pretenses.In this, I believe the burden is on you:
Presumption of innocence - WikipediaIntelligent life exists in the universe or multiverse.

Your a real gem Jar.What you believe is really crazy, instead of trying to pick the speck out of someone else's eye you should concentrate on the plank in your own. Can you not even see how this could further elone's argument? Are you really that dense? It makes sense to me, although I find the idea of God in a airship rather strange. Also lets look at the book of ezekiel.http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/eze001.htmhere is a sample: This could very well be describing a ship of some sort. I don't see why angels don't have rides. i could walk to the store but i'd rather drive.
paraphrased fromHEREThis is a good site to review. very interesting.
The Bible UFO Connection ALL HAIL THE GREAT INTERPRETEREdited by Highestevolvedwhiteguy, : No reason given.

I'll take your word for it, and I will no longer use it if it makes you happy.

I love that historical story, it never gets old. Peace.

What part of the bible are you referencing? I haven't read the bible yet. Also, how would "limited language distinctions" make the bible unbelievable? And what are you talking about with the cloning and what does that have to do with this topic? You should research the word "topic" since you like to "research alot." Here is a start:
Topic Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

And so the plot thickens...

Language is the vehicle for ideas. It is how we express ourselves from the surface to the very depth of our souls. There is no such thing as "evolution of language." They probably would have described them using images and ideas that were and could be related. Back then, perhaps, the only thing flying was a bird. Putting in place UFO's where they could be interpreted would not invalidate the rest.By opening this thread I attempted to discuss the ramifications of UFO's and aliens in a classical, modern, and unorthodox sense. This thread has been flooded with egoistic humanistic opinions that don't allow for the possibility, when it is apparent that the existence of said topics can not be known. Furthermore, by our limited understanding aliens and ufo's could very well be described in the bible. As far as I know nothing in the bible indicates anything is supernatural. This term was adopted by human thought.I would like less posturing of skepticism and more philosophizing on the potential for life and how it relates to the bible. If you don't want to talk about it, leave.P.S. Rob, your writing is wonderful. Your my second favourite hero.

http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/linguisticslinguistics is the study of... not the variations within an allele over time in populations.http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evolutionI could argue that language has gotten worse. The japanese language is far more profound in its simplicity demanding emphasis. Nice straw man. Set 'em up knock 'em down. critical analysis is fine. Delivering your cynicism is off topic. Open up a thread entitled "My Opinion Not Relating To Aliens and the Bible."

I'd like to show the fallacy of your question and your not the only one that has a problem grasping this. When you imagine a flying saucer, you use imagery that you think would best describe how you can express the idea. In the Toe, the implications are that we humans are the highest evolved. Be that as it isn't, this does not indicate that there aren't other things, people, or gods out there or right here. We have five senses and a critical mind. We are three dimensional, and some would suggest up to five. Other beings could be well beyond this. Your thinking as if there is no way alien life could be better than ours. If the Old testament writers saw another manifestation of God or God's messengers or God's created then they would also be limited in their descriptions. If I saw an angel I could only use my knowledge and experience to describe it to you.What people today call aliens could be like what ezekiel saw and what ezekiel and people today see could actually be agents of God, God's created, or angels, or even demons. There is nothing in saying aliens, that contradicts the bible, it is only our limited nature that fails to grasp the concept.Also, not to toot my own horn, but I am a writer and have studied writing extensively and I disagree with your assessment of linguistics. It variates but does not get any better.

You are really annoying.http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evolution Supplementing a definition for your argument is weak and pathetic. How does evolution infer that things progress yet get worse? That's oxymoronic. Under what standard are you calling upon to judge anybody? How do you know that people who experience paranormal activity are lunatics? I think your uber-skepticism is lunacy.

When you originally used evolution, you meant the progression of the language. Which was what I called into question, you found a small out,
congratulations.http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/developEvolution means literally to progress. I would like to know how something can evolve yet digress? So we should not believe anybody that doesn't have supporting evidence? This would be a sad existence devoid of trusting relationships. The story sets up another straw man, in that you seem to be indicating that all people who see things are labeled lunatics for health reasons. However, most people who claim supernatural experiences (not just alien encounters) are not a liability to a certain community. Yes, because like the God you try to be you know everything. Nothing comes to the truth except through anglagard. I agree and disagree because I think I know what your implying. It's like the argument that a person needs to be validated by a certain university to be able to do science. And a person needs to have a certain IQ and reasoning ability to be able to have any actual experience and that experience needs to be validated to be considered. Is this what you are implying?