PaulK writes:
It's pretty clear that Daniel predicted the end at the time of Antiochus Epiphanes.
Jesus predicted that it would occur within the next few decades.
If people didn't assume that Jesus couldn't be wrong I don't think that there would be any significant controversy over either point.
It would be off topic to document most of them, but a number Daniel's prophecies either simply did not happen or could not have happened contemporaneous to when they were written.
As per topic, for example, the "end of sins" and "reconcilliation of iniquity" of Daniel 9:24 did not happen until the vicarious shed blood of Jesus which scripture says "cleanses all sin" I John 1:7.
According to the NT Jesus is the only one who makes for "everlasting righteousness" prophesied in the same verse.
"Anoint the most holy" as per context clearly refers to Jesus, the "most holy" who was anointed by the Holy Spirit as the dove ascended upon him at his baptism. He is clearly the most holy one, (same verse) scripture declaring ALL others to be sinful, coming "short of the glory of God" as per Romans 3:23
"Messiah the Prince" (v 25) who is clearly Jesus as per numerous OT prophecies was to come, again most certainly not contemporaneous to the day written.
So this seventy week period clearly never consumated contemporaneous to when it was written as per the words written in the prophecy.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.