|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,766 Year: 4,023/9,624 Month: 894/974 Week: 221/286 Day: 28/109 Hour: 1/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Noah's Ark volume calculation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
Coyote,
Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. P.S. I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page. Science becomes faith when you claim microevolution leads to macroevolution or when you claim the fossil record supports macroevolution. Edited by Black, : edit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
So you claim that the volume calculation is irrelevant, because the Ark really existed and your proof is the book of genesis?
I just want to make sure I understand you correctly. Oh by the way, how is the book of genesis proof the Ark story really happened?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2132 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. The bible is not scientific evidence. There is no scientific evidence that the ark ever existed. There are mountains of scientific evidence that show the global flood about 4,350 years ago never happened. I have some from my own work. Find an appropriate thread and I'll share it with you. And you mean moot, not mute. Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4742 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: |
The rest of your post is mute. All post are mute. They're written. You mean "moot", troll, but even there you're wrong. You've produced nothing so far but contradiction. Got anything else? Edited by lyx2no, : Punctuation Genesis 2 17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness. 18 And we all live happily ever after.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
Theodoric,
There is no such thing as proof but however it is evidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
lyx2n0,
not true. I ment mute. Oh, and contradiction is enough. Edited by Black, : edit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Oh and the word is moot, not mute.
mute means silent. Might want to brush up on that vocab if you want anyone to take any of your points seriously. Edited by Theodoric, : spelling
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
theodoric,
mute means silent. exactly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2132 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Incorrect. The book of Genesis is evidence that the Ark existed. The rest of your post is mute. The bible is not scientific evidence. There is no scientific evidence that the ark ever existed. There are mountains of scientific evidence that show the global flood about 4,350 years ago never happened. I have some from my own work. Find an appropriate thread and I'll share it with you. And you mean moot, not mute. Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2132 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Oops.
Edited by Coyote, : Eliminate duplicate Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
Coyote,
The book of Genesis does indicate that an ark existed therefor it is evidence. I ment mute. In other words: be silent or your post is silent. It's a metaphor. Are we going to attack each other all day or are we going to debate? Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit Edited by Black, : edit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2132 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
Coyote, The book of Genesis does indicate that an ark existed therefor it is evidence. I ment mute. In other words: STFU This thread is in the Science Forum. Evidence here should be scientific evidence. The bible is not scientific evidence; it is folklore and myth. The scientific evidence shows that the purported global flood about 4,350 years ago didn't happen as described. And no, I won't STFU. Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IchiBan Member (Idle past 4963 days) Posts: 88 Joined: |
Folklore and myth is the destiny of most science. What was science at one point in time is now folklore and myth. Science continually gives new answers that are not necessarily more correct just new.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
Coyote,
http://ehwchurch.org/...nar+3+-+Dinosaurs+and+the+Bible.html check the link out it has some good information in it. just click play when the link loads. Edited by Black, : edit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Black Member (Idle past 5209 days) Posts: 77 Joined: |
ichiBan,
Yeah lol.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024