Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,275 Year: 5,532/9,624 Month: 557/323 Week: 54/143 Day: 16/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ten-sai, Evidence, Law, & Science.
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5990 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 11 of 50 (24897)
11-29-2002 2:47 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Ten-sai
11-28-2002 8:49 PM


quote:
Anyway, the Rules of Evidence will most certainly apply to the civil rights suit I will visit upon some unsuspecting professor of evolution one day.
This is twice now you've made the claim that you intend to file a civil rights suit "someday". **Yawn**. When you actually get the nerve to file it, come back and tell us.
Alternatively, you could give it your best shot here - on this board. Go for it, slick.
Flippin' wannabe-somebody ambulance chaser. All tort lawyers should be drowned at birth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Ten-sai, posted 11-28-2002 8:49 PM Ten-sai has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5990 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 14 of 50 (24910)
11-29-2002 7:06 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Ten-sai
11-29-2002 5:52 AM


Hey slick - never said your suit would fail. Merely pointed out that pontificating on what you're going to do at some unspecified time in the future is a joke. It's very difficult to take you seriously - and even if I did, I couldn't care less about what a lawyer thinks about biology, or science, or literally anything else. (I except my corporate attorney - he's great at keeping us out of trouble various government agencies inre taxes, licenses, etc.)
It looks to me you literally have no argument since all you've done since you showed up here is repeat the same insults. You've neither supported your assertions, nor even shown you know anything about the law. Just proclaimed that none of us do. Guess what? Who cares?
Tell you what, if we're all so ignorant, why bother even proclaiming it? You really ought to try some other board - the BaptistBoard, or ChristianForums, for example. You'll have lots of people groveling at your feet in awe of your expertise in no time. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that anyone here is overly impressed.
Do let me know whenever you decide to actually post something substantive, won't you. Or actually file your "civil rights suit" lol.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Ten-sai, posted 11-29-2002 5:52 AM Ten-sai has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5990 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 40 of 50 (26265)
12-11-2002 2:00 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by wj
12-11-2002 1:10 AM


wj: You may have a point about the deliberate provocation, but I doubt it was simply to avoid answering questions. My guess would be that it was a deliberate attempt to "prove" bias by being so obnoxious that the moderator(s) had no choice but to take action. Although I may simply be paranoid, I find it interesting that ten-sai showed up roughly at the same time biased moderating was brought up concerning the OCW fiasco, etc. May only be a simple coincidence, but sometimes even paranoids have enemies...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by wj, posted 12-11-2002 1:10 AM wj has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5990 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 46 of 50 (26317)
12-11-2002 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by gene90
12-11-2002 11:09 AM


The "other" Karl being the first, IIRC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by gene90, posted 12-11-2002 11:09 AM gene90 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024