arach writes:
do we see the double standard here? why is the book of mormon not ok, but say the new testament is? they line about with the ot about as well.
Or the gnostic gospels, or the gospel according to Biff.
Seriously, I can't stand that argument about which chapters were TRULY inspired and which weren't.
xevo writes:
There were many criteria which were involved in the determination of whether or not they were inspired texts.
What would those be? Were they peer reviewed by religious scholars?Could you
please post a link to these criteria?
This message has been edited by custard, 02-26-2005 05:02 AM
™ Version 4.2