Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Corrupting the Old Testament at all costs?
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 61 of 121 (177091)
01-14-2005 6:08 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by ramoss
01-14-2005 5:41 PM


ramoss, Do you have any other instance within the bible that the word almah is refering to a harlot, someone not a virgin?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by ramoss, posted 01-14-2005 5:41 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by ramoss, posted 01-14-2005 6:31 PM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 66 by Brian, posted 01-14-2005 7:28 PM johnfolton has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 62 of 121 (177094)
01-14-2005 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by mike the wiz
01-07-2005 5:15 PM


You are ignoring Jewish law and tradition.
Of the SEED of David means direct male decendant, no adoptions or anything like that. That was the understanding of it. The Cohens and the Levites had the same set up with the priesthood. A person could not
become a Cohen or a Levite to serve in the temple via adoption.. it had to be a naturally born child of that father.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by mike the wiz, posted 01-07-2005 5:15 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 63 of 121 (177096)
01-14-2005 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by IrishRockhound
01-08-2005 12:49 PM


Well, for #2, no, he wouldn't. He was decended from David from a line that was 'cursed' and therefore that line is not eligable to take the davidic throne.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by IrishRockhound, posted 01-08-2005 12:49 PM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 64 of 121 (177099)
01-14-2005 6:28 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by IrishRockhound
01-10-2005 1:03 PM


Re: Insert Fingers in Ears,,but mike furthers confusion
One point.. when it comes to the Jewish tradition.. it would not matter what lineage Mary is.... the lineage goes through the father for the tribe/house.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by IrishRockhound, posted 01-10-2005 1:03 PM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 65 of 121 (177100)
01-14-2005 6:31 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 6:08 PM


Re:
Well, there is no incident where ALmah means virgin. It is not exclusive to virgin.. but the hebrew word for Virgin is Bethulla, which Isaiah used elsewhere in this chapter.
If you read just a few sentances after 7:14, you can see how Isaiah caused 7:14 to be fullfilled. Isaiah 8:3.. I went to the prophetess and
insured she conceived. In other words, Isaiah is talking about his own son, and the sign to King Ahaz was before this kid was more than a toddler, certain events would happen (Isa 8:4 For before the child shall have knowledge to cry, My father, and my mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria shall be taken away before the king of Assyria.)
The sign is not that the child is going to be born.. but rather, it is a poetic way of giving a time period.
If you want to look at where ALmah is not being refered to a virgin, look at the song of solomon, where an almah is refered to in very intimate and erotic terms.
This message has been edited by ramoss, 01-14-2005 18:39 AM
This message has been edited by ramoss, 01-14-2005 18:43 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 6:08 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4988 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 66 of 121 (177113)
01-14-2005 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 6:08 PM


Poor wee Miriam
Where do you get the idea that 'Almah' refers to a harlot?
Almah simply means 'young woman', she may or may not be a virgin.
However, if someone wanted to highlight the fact that a girl was a virgin they would call her a 'bethulah'
Here are another 6 examples of almah being used for a young woman. If you want to see Moses' sister as a harlot then God have mercy on your soul
Genesis 24:43
Exodus 2:8
Proverbs 30:19
Psalm68:26
Song of Solomon 1:3 and 6:8
Edited to change 'almah' to 'bethulah'.
This message has been edited by Brian, 01-15-2005 02:21 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 6:08 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 10:08 PM Brian has replied
 Message 68 by jar, posted 01-14-2005 10:30 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 69 by ramoss, posted 01-14-2005 11:40 PM Brian has replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 67 of 121 (177161)
01-14-2005 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Brian
01-14-2005 7:28 PM


Poor wee Miriam
Brian, I agree there is two words used to call a woman a virgin, it used both words to describe Rebecca. It appears more correct of the two word choices almah was used to describe Mary, because it was using the word that would make this be both a young girl, and a virgin.
If the word bethu^la^h would of been used the child could of been born by an old maid. Truly alma^h was the more descriptive correct word for virgin in relation to this sign given to the House of David. If a young damsel was going to give birth it wouldn't be a sign, the sign was a virgin that was a young damsel shall conceive and would be called Immanuel.
kjv Isa 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Gen 24:16 And the damsel5291 was very3966 fair2896 to look upon,4758 a virgin,1330 neither3808 had any man376 known3045 her: and she went down3381 to the well,5869 and filled4390 her pitcher,3537 and came up.
Gen 24:43 Behold,2009 I595 stand5324 by5921 the well5869 of water;4325 and it shall come to pass,1961 that when the virgin5959 cometh forth3318 to draw7579 water, and I say559 to413 her, Give me, I pray thee,4994 a little4592 water4325 of thy pitcher4480, 3537 to drink;8248
5927 ‛alma^h
BDB Definition:
1) virgin, young woman
1a) of marriageable age
1b) maid or newly married
Part of Speech: noun feminine
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: from H5958
Same Word by TWOT Number: 1630b
H1330

bethu^la^h
BDB Definition:
1) virgin
Part of Speech: noun feminine
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: passive participle of an unused root meaning to separate
Same Word by TWOT Number: 295a
This message has been edited by Tom, 01-14-2005 22:16 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Brian, posted 01-14-2005 7:28 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by ramoss, posted 01-14-2005 11:41 PM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 72 by Brian, posted 01-15-2005 2:44 AM johnfolton has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 68 of 121 (177163)
01-14-2005 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Brian
01-14-2005 7:28 PM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
Does Poor wee Miriam relate to PeeWee Herman? Google if needed.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Brian, posted 01-14-2005 7:28 PM Brian has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 69 of 121 (177169)
01-14-2005 11:40 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Brian
01-14-2005 7:28 PM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
Partly wrong. If they wanted to highlight she was a virgin, they would use 'Bethula'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Brian, posted 01-14-2005 7:28 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Brian, posted 01-15-2005 2:20 AM ramoss has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 70 of 121 (177170)
01-14-2005 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 10:08 PM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
Part of the problem with strong is he was coming from the Christian biblical definnitions. He has made quite a few mistakes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 10:08 PM johnfolton has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4988 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 71 of 121 (177195)
01-15-2005 2:20 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by ramoss
01-14-2005 11:40 PM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
Cheers Ramoss,
Of course Imeant to type 'Bethulah' instead of almah, cheers.
It was Friday night after all
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by ramoss, posted 01-14-2005 11:40 PM ramoss has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4988 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 72 of 121 (177198)
01-15-2005 2:44 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 10:08 PM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
HI Tom,
Brian, I agree there is two words used to call a woman a virgin, it used both words to describe Rebecca. It appears more correct of the two word choices almah was used to describe Mary, because it was using the word that would make this be both a young girl, and a virgin.
But, an almah does not necessarily have to be a virgin.
Are there any references where almah is used when the girl is undoubtedly a virgin?
The hting is, the word 'bethulah' is used many times when the author specifically wants the reader to know that the girl was a virgin.
Isaiah 62:5
For as a young man marrieth a virgin, so shall thy sons marry thee: and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee.
Whoever wrote Isaiah used the word bethulah here because he wanted to ensure that the reader knew that the gilr was a virgin.
If the word bethu^la^h would of been used the child could of been born by an old maid
It would be unusual for a female in ancient Israel to have been an old maid. But the age of the female is not the issue.
Truly alma^h was the more descriptive correct word for virgin in relation to this sign given to the House of David. If a young damsel was going to give birth it wouldn't be a sign, the sign was a virgin that was a young damsel shall conceive and would be called Immanuel.
No.
The sign was that a young woman would concieve, most likely Isaiah's wife the prophetess, and it is the child that is a sign.
Also, how many times do you need to be informed that Jesus was not called Immanuel?
Finally, if the Isaiah prophecy is relating to a virgin, then Jesus' birth is not the first virgin birth in the Bible. The female mentioned in 7:14 gave birth as a sign to Ahaz, therefore, Jesus' virgin birth is not that special.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 10:08 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by ramoss, posted 01-15-2005 9:56 AM Brian has not replied
 Message 74 by johnfolton, posted 01-15-2005 1:34 PM Brian has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 73 of 121 (177238)
01-15-2005 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Brian
01-15-2005 2:44 AM


Re: Poor wee Miriam
In addition to Almah not exclusvely meaning virgin, the word it was translated to in the Septagaint (parthenos) does not exclusively mean virgin either.
The translation into a greek of a woman that was raped in Genesis was
translated to Parthnos too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Brian, posted 01-15-2005 2:44 AM Brian has not replied

  
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5620 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 74 of 121 (177278)
01-15-2005 1:34 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Brian
01-15-2005 2:44 AM


Brian, My Hebrew concordance says Immanuel is the prophetic name of the Messiah. When one calls Jesus the Christ your acknowledging God with us. In Matthew chapter 1 verses 23-25 it talks of what the Lord Jesus would be called both. Jesus and Emmanuel (Jesus Christ).
H6005
עמּנוּאל
‛imma^nu^'e^l
BDB Definition:
Immanuel = God with us or with us is God
1) symbolic and prophetic name of the Messiah, the Christ, prophesying that He would be born of a virgin and would be ‘God with us’
Part of Speech: noun proper masculine
A Related Word by BDB/Strong’s Number: from H5973 and H410 with a pronominal suffix inserted
Same Word by TWOT Number: 1640d
G1694
Ἐμμανουήλ
Emmanouel
em-man-oo-ale'
Of Hebrew origin [H6005]; God with us; Emmanuel, a name of Christ: - Emmanuel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Brian, posted 01-15-2005 2:44 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Brian, posted 01-16-2005 6:40 AM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 76 by ramoss, posted 01-16-2005 9:09 AM johnfolton has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4988 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 75 of 121 (177481)
01-16-2005 6:40 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by johnfolton
01-15-2005 1:34 PM


Back on the merry-go-round
HI Tom,
Brian, My Hebrew concordance says Immanuel is the prophetic name of the Messiah.
Your concordance is incorrect then. If it is the name of the Messiah, then the Messiah can be found in Isaiah 8. As Jesus is NEVER called Immanuel then once again he cannot be the Messiah.
When one calls Jesus the Christ your acknowledging God with us.
This is not the meaning of the name Immanuel.
The meaning is that God is with us in our purpose, He is on our side against our enemies if you like. It does not mean that God is literally going about the city in the form of a man interacting with humans. It means that God is with us in whatever venture we are on.
In Matthew chapter 1 verses 23-25 it talks of what the Lord Jesus would be called both. Jesus and Emmanuel (Jesus Christ).
In Matthew 1:21 it says that She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus,because he will save his people from their sins.
Apparently he was to be called Jesus (Yahweh saves), and is called Jesus all through the new testament. But, where in the new testament does anyone qualify Matthew 1:23?
The New Testament NEVER has anyone call Jesus by the name Immanuel.
I also find it interesting that the author of Matthew has to explain the meaning of the name Immanuel to his audience.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by johnfolton, posted 01-15-2005 1:34 PM johnfolton has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Phat, posted 01-16-2005 6:21 PM Brian has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024