buzsaw writes:
BTW, Holmes, I'd tend to agree with your added criteria
I'm glad to hear this, but then I submit to you that the prophecies so far given have failed based on criteria 1 (my more generalized definition), 2, 5, and 6.
The prophecy of his gospel being taught across the inhabited world is neither uncommon, nor (and this is more important) coherent and constrained. Even with the "generation" issue removed, this particular prophecy occured hundreds of years ago, unless "across the inhabited world" is an incoherent characteristic. If its occuring hundreds of years ago is still allowed as point of prophecy for events today, then its temporal contraint is too "loose".
I realize this is not the "Israel prophecy" thread, but I might as well address the prophetical constraints here. The fall of Jerusalem was certainly not an uncommon "vision", and the idea that its inhabitants would make a come back at some point was not really bizarre. I'll admit it was optimistic, but hardly improbable. I would have agreed its prediction would have been amazing if it occured in short order (within a "generation") as such comebacks in that time period were more uncommon.
However the temporal constraint has opened to nearly two millenia. And what's worse, the fulfillment of the prophecy was so wholly common due to its being conducted by devotees of both Judeo and Xtian sects (only once they had become superpowers and the land desired a 3rd world nonnation) that it is purely self-fulfilling prophecy. It was desired to make the prophecy finally happen, and having it within their power to do so, they did so.
I would like to see something with much greater coherence, temporal constraint, and of an uncommon nature (certainly not pure self-fulfillment).
------------------
holmes