Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,395 Year: 3,652/9,624 Month: 523/974 Week: 136/276 Day: 10/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   5 Questions...
mark24
Member (Idle past 5216 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 106 of 107 (788)
12-15-2001 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by redstang281
12-15-2001 4:28 PM


Better not, I'm just getting started!
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by redstang281, posted 12-15-2001 4:28 PM redstang281 has not replied

joz
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 107 (861)
12-17-2001 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by redstang281
12-13-2001 11:38 AM


quote:
Originally posted by redstang281:
I understand what you are saying. I hope that you understand that I am saying that the whole concept of God precludes him from being defined by science.
Ok once more unto the breach....
All I am trying to debate with you is your original claim that God was above science...
This is not the precursor to any attempt by me to disprove God due to a lack of evidence for his existence. I personally believe this is poor reasoning (I argued against a similar line of thought in our "inevitable sin and free will" debate).
I merely wish you to consider that given that God affects the universe in any way then these interactions are as a consequence of their effect observable. Thus through these interactions it is possible to observe God....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by redstang281, posted 12-13-2001 11:38 AM redstang281 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024