So when I refer to love I liken it to faith (and God to a point) as in it is something not provable by physical evidence but none the less, still exists.
But that is where your logic fails. Loving somone or having faith in somone loving you doesn't prove their existence. I could tell you I love my friend Harry the Rabbit and that I believe he loves me but that doesn't make Harry real. Sorry Harry

On another point that just confounds me. I can't understand how people can not see that the belief or religion they hold to be true is on a large basis based on where they were born and live. If you lived in Bombay, India or Cairo Egypt it'd be a likely prospect that you'd likely be arguing the Hindi or Muslim religion and how perfect they were, and how other religions were false.
Science is presented in a manner that allows itself to be tested and proven. We correct or disregard that which is proven to be false. It is testable. Faith isn't and that is where it fails from a scientific standpoint. Faith is not evidence. While proscribing to any faith is your right, it doesn't make God or any other supreme being or supernatural power testable or evidential.