Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Something Wrong with Mother Earth?
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 84 (177152)
01-14-2005 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by CK
01-14-2005 5:58 PM


Re: The question?
Both. I have led organizations of over 300 employees, but yet I was still subject to my own boss. I held my people accountable to meet certain performance standards, while my boss held me accountable as well. We are all accountable to someone (whether you believe it or not).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by CK, posted 01-14-2005 5:58 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by berberry, posted 01-15-2005 2:01 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 84 (177157)
01-14-2005 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by crashfrog
01-14-2005 5:38 PM


Liberal journalism....
Crash,
Dude, you must be one of those journalists who works for the liberal media. Your responses to me are nothing more than taking sound bites out of context, then spinning them out of control to give yourself something to chew on. I have not claimed to possess absolute knowledge about any subject. Can anyone?
If I state, "cigar smoke causes cancer", do I need to have been the scientist in charge of multiple (and extensive) lab tests that determined this? Or if a jury finds a defendant guilty of a crime, do they need to be eye witnesses to the crime in order for their judgment to be valid? Or can we "believe" the defendant is guilty based on eye witness testimony and physical evidence (etc)?
If your doctor insists you have a serious illness and prescribes medicine, do you believe him (faith) or do you go out and get your own medical degree before you decide to take the life-saving medicine? (comment on that and we'll need a new thread)
quote:
Says you, but you can scarcely have made an exhaustive survey, now can you?
No, says not me. Says God almighty, who DOES happen to have absolute knowledge. How do I know that? I can explain in depth, but that would be off topic (we can start a new thread/topic, but your apparent hostility toward God might make it a waste of time).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by crashfrog, posted 01-14-2005 5:38 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2005 1:53 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5927 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 63 of 84 (177174)
01-15-2005 12:36 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Juhrahnimo
01-14-2005 8:58 AM


Re: Something wrong with the earth?
Juhrahnimo
The heavens declare the glory of God. To deny that, is to say that the universe created itself. How could that be?
Do you wish to tall me why it must be god? And what is the difficulty with the universe being its own cause?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-14-2005 8:58 AM Juhrahnimo has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 64 of 84 (177187)
01-15-2005 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Juhrahnimo
01-14-2005 9:58 PM


Dude, you must be one of those journalists who works for the liberal media.
God, I wish.
But no. I'm just someone who's smart enough to see your bullshit for what it is, and rude enough to actually call you on it.
Says God almighty
Leaving aside the question of your ability to talk to God, isn't it His behavior that's under scrutiny? After all a wife beater might very well justify his behavior with "she deserved it", but why should we believe him? God lets/causes bad things to happen to good people; why should we believe him when he says that the bad things that he does to us are because we deserve it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-14-2005 9:58 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 9:45 AM crashfrog has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 84 (177189)
01-15-2005 2:01 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Juhrahnimo
01-14-2005 9:37 PM


Re: The question?
Juhrahnimo writes:
quote:
I have led organizations of over 300 employees, but yet I was still subject to my own boss.
We can gather that you didn't own your own business.
quote:
I held my people accountable to meet certain performance standards, while my boss held me accountable as well. We are all accountable to someone (whether you believe it or not).
Meaning what, there's a god? Because you fall someone along the middle of the chain of command at work? How do you figure?

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-14-2005 9:37 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 9:42 AM berberry has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3476 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 66 of 84 (177204)
01-15-2005 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Juhrahnimo
01-14-2005 8:49 AM


Which Commandments
Which commandments specifically?
The Ten?
What Jesus told the rich man?
The golden rule?
Ezekiel 18:21-22
But if a wicked man turns away from all the sins he has committed and keeps all my decrees and does what is just and right, he will surely live; he will not die. None of the offenses he has committed will be remembered against him. Because of the righteous things he has done, he will live.

A gentle answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-14-2005 8:49 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 9:40 AM purpledawn has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5891 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 67 of 84 (177232)
01-15-2005 8:35 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by robinrohan
01-14-2005 1:42 PM


Hell in a Handbasket
Quetzal, are you talking about global warming or something?
Partly, but not mostly. The effects of global warming/global climate change have only been modeled - and the models don't always agree. However, at the minimum, all agree that the risk of severe disruption in global weather patterns is very high. These include things like flooding in desert regions, drought in agricultural regions, increased likelihood of severe storms, etc. Not to mention the disruption in the current patterns that give us our weather today (like the Gulf Stream disappearing/moving southward because of massive influx of cold water from melting ice caps, etc). The more pertinent aspect of immediate weather problems (like the severe storms hitting the US) relates to ENSO ("El Nino-Southern Oscillation") effects. We seem to be entering another - and perhaps extreme - cycle now.
Most of what I was thinking about related to human activity: desertification caused by unsustainable land use patterns leading to famine (c.f., the Saharan rim); deforestation leading to things like increased landslide activity (and concurrent loss of human life; Google Posoltega "Hurricane Mitch" Nicaragua for a stark example), increases in pest species (like mosquitos and disease-carrying flies), and release of EIDs ("emerging infectious diseases") from hitherto unknown/untapped disease reservoirs; famine through distruction of "wild" type crop plants leading to reduced resistence in domesticated crops (with no reserve of genetic variability to draw from) and overuse of pesticides/herbicides leading to ever-more resistent strains of pathogens/phytophagous insects; and finally homogenization of the biosphere caused by bioinvasion impelled by globalization. All of these things combined leading to horrendous wars and mass deaths over competition for dwindling resources and living space.
IOW, the fundies are right: we quite likely are heading for something resembling "End Times" (if you define that to mean "the end result being a world unrecognizable by today's standards"). However, there's nothing supernatural about it. >99% can be dropped directly at the doorstep of human activity. The good news is, we CAN do something to stop/mitigate the problems. Some things we're already working on (preservation of wild strains, identification of new food crop types, etc), as well as attempting to limit some of the worst pollution-caused destruction. However, it's far from certain we'll be willing to do enough to stave off our own destruction. Great world we're leaving our children, isn't it?
And I'm not even a radical environmentalist! You should hear some of the doomsday scenarios put forward by the enviro-wackos!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by robinrohan, posted 01-14-2005 1:42 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 84 (177234)
01-15-2005 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by purpledawn
01-15-2005 4:10 AM


Re: Which Commandments
Great post, thank you. But we tend to read too much into it, then fall off the other side of the horse. Ezekiel gave us a supposed "simple" solution to our problem, BUT we couldn't do it. If mankind would have been able to do what Ezekiel 18 called for, then the sacrifice of Jesus would have been unnecessary. Instead, God saw we couldn't turn from our sins, so he sent his son to make us new creatures (a mystery indeed).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by purpledawn, posted 01-15-2005 4:10 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by purpledawn, posted 01-15-2005 12:49 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 84 (177235)
01-15-2005 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by berberry
01-15-2005 2:01 AM


Re: The question?
You obivously didn't get the question that I was answering from Mark Knight.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by berberry, posted 01-15-2005 2:01 AM berberry has not replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 70 of 84 (177236)
01-15-2005 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by crashfrog
01-15-2005 1:53 AM


Da judge
So, the mean ol' judge who sentenced a murdered to death is at fault for the murderer's death? Ok, forget capital punishment; let's say the judge sentences the murderer to life in prison. Same question; is the judge mean? Or just? Without accountability, who would would basic laws?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2005 1:53 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by CK, posted 01-15-2005 10:56 AM Juhrahnimo has replied
 Message 73 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2005 12:34 PM Juhrahnimo has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4146 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 71 of 84 (177247)
01-15-2005 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Juhrahnimo
01-15-2005 9:45 AM


Re: Da judge
That's a poor example - those laws are developed via debate and consent - not in the same way that your christian godhead murders people for showing their breasts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 9:45 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 12:14 PM CK has not replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 84 (177259)
01-15-2005 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by CK
01-15-2005 10:56 AM


Liberal journalism again...
Charles,
You can't seem to let go of that sound bite, can you? So, since you can't let it go, I'll engage you on it: Check out a recent article from MSNBC at WHOA!!!
Again, it's the rebelion against God that is the subject, not breasts. Every rebellion starts somewhere. War doesn't start with a fired bullet. Osama didn't start his campaign against us by crashing planes into buildings. But the article above describes a scenario that begins quite simply, then proceeds toward fornication, adultery, revelry, drunkeness, divorce, broken homes, spread of disease, etc. etc. etc! VERY short term fun, followed by long misery. If you can't see that, then you've lived a sheltered life.
My original post didn't say God murders people for showing their breasts, and I'm convinced you're aware of that (but yet you posted it anyway). You've just chosen to use a "liberal media" method of trashing someone who doesn't support your view (namely, using sound bites, twisting words/concepts, and ignoring the spirit of the message).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by CK, posted 01-15-2005 10:56 AM CK has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 73 of 84 (177262)
01-15-2005 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Juhrahnimo
01-15-2005 9:45 AM


Without accountability, who would would basic laws?
Accountability of who, though? Certainly I believe that crimes should be punished; but God punishes people, apparently, who have done nothing wrong - who could have done nothing wrong, like infants and children.
It's all very well and good for you to say "if something bad happens to someone, it's always because of something they did", but can't you see that that's just blaming-the-victim ad-hoc-ery?
A judge that sentences a murderer to punishment is just. But a judge that sentences everyone to death, whether or not they've committed a crime, is a murder himself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 9:45 AM Juhrahnimo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 12:41 PM crashfrog has replied

  
Juhrahnimo
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 84 (177264)
01-15-2005 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by crashfrog
01-15-2005 12:34 PM


Ah, yes...
...and that's where the concept of evolution comes into play. If we leave an intelligent creator out of the picture, then there are no laws; we just make our own. But if there is a God and we rebel against him, even join up with the enemy, then we cause problems for those around us. But God has given us a way out; Jesus.
We're way off topic, and I'm probably about to get chewed out again for it. Can we can continue this over coffee at the Coffee House?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2005 12:34 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by crashfrog, posted 01-15-2005 12:47 PM Juhrahnimo has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1486 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 75 of 84 (177266)
01-15-2005 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Juhrahnimo
01-15-2005 12:41 PM


Can we can continue this over coffee at the Coffee House?
Absolutely, but only if you're going to actually address my points. You did not do so in this post.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Juhrahnimo, posted 01-15-2005 12:41 PM Juhrahnimo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024