|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is the evolutionairy theory on the Giraffe? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5194 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
quote: 1/ If a Giraffe was in a rainforest, its head would constantly be in the interlocking tree canopy. Simply moving is a problem. Restricted view for predator evasion, not to mention flight. 2/ Yes & no, depending on whether your a tree, having your seeds dispersed in Giraffe dung, or an insect sitting on a high leaf about to be eaten. ------------------Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
quote: Which would help to keep insects from becoming over populated. Why did just the giraffe's neck grow and not his whole body? Why did he become misproportioned?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5194 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
quote: Not sure of your point as regards insects. The Giraffes neck grew more than its entire body as this is the most economical way of gaining height. A huge body requires more food than just a long neck. For the Giraffe, a huge body & the extra bones & musculature required to support it is a survival disadvantage compared to a long neck. ie It may cost more to keep than the extra food it brings in. The Giraffe isn't misproportioned, it is OPTIMALLY proportioned for its lifestyle. ------------------Occam's razor is not for shaving with. [This message has been edited by mark24, 12-16-2001] [This message has been edited by mark24, 12-16-2001]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22388 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
An interesting question often asked about ID (which I know isn't advocated by Redstang, I introduce it for another reason) is why God's designs are identical with evolution. This often comes up when people question why God would design humans so poorly, eg, why the appendix, why blood vessels in front of the retina, why a body cavity design best suited for horizontal positioning, why tonsils, and so forth. The argument is that good enough designs, vestigial organs, etc, are what one would expect of evolution, not of a divine designer. Assuming consistent arguments are preferable, could it instead be argued that the giraffe body design is good enough for its ecological niche, rather than optimal? --Percy [This message has been edited by Percipient, 12-17-2001]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5194 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
quote: I concede the point. I was just trying to get across the point (badly) that a Giraffe can only be misproportioned when compared to another Giraffe, at least thats what I was trying to say!! Evolution would be well described as "the search for the optimal design". While I'm at it, my answers to Redstang are not meant to be absolute truths, just possible/likely scenarios that describe how mutation & natural selection combine to allow variation not allowed by purely sexual (or asexual, for that matter) reproduction. ------------------Occam's razor is not for shaving with. [This message has been edited by Percipient, 12-17-2001]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
quote: Did you know that the giraffe's body itself is actually smaller than that of a horse?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Percipient:
[b]
The creationist pov of vestigial organs is that we just don't know what they do yet.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5194 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by redstang281:
The creationist pov of vestigial organs is that we just don't know what they do yet. [/B][/QUOTE] Wouldn't you be able to determine this by looking at an organism that had the fully developed organ? eg Ruminants. In the case of the caecum (appendix)its for digestion of cellulose. All the other organs in ruminants have the same function as our organs, liver, kidney, lungs. Our caecums produce no hormones or enzymes, & no longer digest cellulose, or anything else for that matter. The organ IS function-less. If the caecum has a function, the onus is on creationists to show it, where science has failed. Go on, theorise. ------------------Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
quote: Just because we don't know what it does now, doesn't mean we never will. Tonsils once thought to be useless actually help prevent disease. Those who have had their tonsils removed are actually 4 times more likely to develop Hodgkin’s disease. But this is getting off topic anyways.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
Did you know that a full grown giraffe's heart weighs over 24 pounds and pumps 16 gallons a minute? Because the giraffe's heart is much larger than his head, a series of special one-way, back-flow preventer valves are needed in the neck to regulate the flow of blood to the head, especially when the giraffe is bending down to get that much needed drink of water. Without these valves, the immense blood pressure coupled with gravity would make for one nasty headache and other such repercussions. Elastic blood vessels in the giraffe's head allow harboring of enough blood to prevent the giraffe from passing out when bent in this position.
How did this evolve?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
joz Inactive Member |
quote: Well just a guess but probably gradually, over the period of time that the neck was lengthening, those giraffes that didn't keel over of massive cerebral heamorages every time they bent over were more likely to pass their genes on... Are you even vaguely familiar with the concept of natural selection? On another note what the hell has the weight of the heart got to do with it? Surely the power with which it pumps blood is far more relevant.....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5194 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
quote: A mutation that placed pre-existing venal valve in arteries? Veins/capilleries are elastic anyway, so successive mutations that make the said vessels "more elastic" would do the trick. ------------------Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
quote: Wow, so not only would all that have to occur, but also the giraffe would have to be isolated and we would hope that the giraffe baby could nurse milk off the giraffe for a long enough time to grow to reach the tree branches. This is why the evolution community has given up on that theory of giraffe evolution and has started a new one. Meanwhile the creationists still maintain the giraffe was created a giraffe as God designed him as one of the creatures to help maintain plant grow.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
joz Inactive Member |
quote: Which would be fine if you had any evidence for your explanation other than a 2000 year old religious document...... Oh and I think you meant growth not grow....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
redstang281 Inactive Member |
quote: It's funny the extent people have to go through to try and prove the bible wrong. Their theories change all the time. Yet this single Book stays the same.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024