|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 52 (9226 total) |
| |
ChemEngrMBA | |
Total: 921,198 Year: 1,520/6,935 Month: 283/518 Week: 50/73 Day: 0/36 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 230 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: When Will The End-Times Be And How Will We Know? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18745 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Tangle writes: Whether we're actually capable of fully shrugging off the superstitious nonsense that's still holding back most of the world AND saving ourselves from the animal behaviors we inherit from our recent history as descended apes, is still in the balance. One man's superstitious nonsense is another man's recipe for sanity. For one thing, most who call themselves churchgoers and members of the club are not at the level where they see prayer as anything more than a group ritual. "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9666 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
Phat writes: One man's superstitious nonsense is another man's recipe for sanity. Superstition is objectively nonsense - the fact that some dumb humans need to cling onto it for their sanity is sad but irrelevant. For one thing, most who call themselves churchgoers and members of the club are not at the level where they see prayer as anything more than a group ritual. Well they'd be right about that at least. Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine. "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 774 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
It's not an interpretation. It's what the Bible says. What scriptures have I misused recently?
ringo writes:
No. I call your (and) jars interpretation of the truth a lie. Genesis 2. You call the truth a lie and the lie truth. Phat writes:
Sure there would. A parent sometimes lies to his child to protect him.
God does not lie. (There would be no reason to do so) Phat writes:
There is no devil in Genesis 2.
And there is no truth in the devil, according to scripture. Phat writes:
And yet you never say anything good about it.
Secular humanism is neither good nor evil. Phat writes:
No. It's man's attempt to get things done without relying on fantasies.
It is simply mans attempt to ignore the "God concept" and figure life out on our own. Phat writes:
Pretty well.
How is that working for us? Phat writes:
Here's a hint for Him: If you want to commune with me, don't threaten to fry me.
Besides....God wants Communion with humanity. Phat writes:
That's just a convenient lie. God wants what you want Him to want.
He is not OK with us simply being indifferent due to "lack of evidence". Phat writes:
You know it is. And by the way, who told tou that unbelief is a default option? You don't believe in Zeus. Why not? Because unbelief is the default option.You don't believe in Quetzalcoatl. Why not? Because unbelief is the default option. You don't believe in Rael. Why not? Because unbelief is the default option. You don't believe in Thor. Why not? Because unbelief is the default option. You don't believe in Brahman. Why not? Because unbelief is the default option. Why do you pretend that belief is a wonderful thing when you have almost as much unbelief as I do?
quoting romans, Phat writes:
No one seeks for God. Not seeking God is the default.
as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one;11 no one understands; no one seeks for God. 12 All have turned aside; Phat writes:
Fallacy of appeal to popularity. The truth doesn't have to be popular.
You and jar both mention Genesis 2. That view is very much a minority viewpoint. Phat writes:
If you had anything to back up your popular opinion, we could finish with it once and for all. But as long as you continue to repeat the lie, I will continue to expose it as a lie. Yet you say it every darn time we interact."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18745 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Attempting to go to a gold standard would be an attempt to set the value through common agreement. Somehow, you are blind to that. No. The value of the dollar sets the price of Gold (for now) but the value (in dollars) of the Gold only reflects the worth of the dollar. In my opinion, humans attempted to use the dollar to replace Gold (as an international barometer) but in my opinion, will soon see that as futile.
I do not see any evidence supporting this.
So answer me this. If the purchasing power of the dollar dropped (as it always has in relative terms) less Gold would be required to back the central Banks in the event of a fiat currency collapse. Do you not see how Gold will always invisibly "back" fiat currencies even if decoupled from them. Well maybe not always...but in the foreseeable future. ![]() "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6492 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined:
|
Do you not see how Gold will always invisibly "back" fiat currencies even if decoupled from them. No, I don't see that at all.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 201 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
For a long, long time it was not gold but salt.
For a long time it was not salt but incense. For a long time it was not incense but tobacco. For a short time it was tulips.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18745 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Maybe you wouldn't mind at all if currency became digital and everyone (rich and poor) was forced to pay their fair share for the common good. Nobody could hoard anything then.
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8733 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
The vast wads of currency in this world are already digital.
If you're talking crypto then, well, that's as productive as NFTs. Foolish. We do not have $100s of billions in actual bills. But many $100s of billions is wire transferred digitally every day. Do you know how currency is created? It does not roll off a printing press. It is created by bank loans. Shocking. And that newly created currency is all digital. Does this mean governments can get a hold of this stream to extract payments as it may want? Probably, but not easily given the elite's political control over the governments and the courts, and they haven't done so since digital took over. There is not much incentive to disrupt a system that works for elites and governments alike. Now, if we get rid of the elites and their political puppets we can better equalize wealth over the world. So digital currency, whether fiat or crypto, means nothing. What is important is the humanity behind the politics and, today this sucks.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6492 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined:
|
Maybe you wouldn't mind at all if currency became digital and everyone (rich and poor) was forced to pay their fair share for the common good. Nobody could hoard anything then. As AZPaul3 said, currency is already digital. Perhaps you intended that as a reference to crypto-currency. I'm skeptical of crypto-currency. It is not at all clear what you were really trying to ask. There will always be those who live by theft and fail to pay their fair share toward the common good. And there will always hoarders. That's just human nature. Christianity has not been able to repeal human nature, and humanism won't be able to do it eitherFundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18745 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
Quora writes: World GDP, which is around $73 trillion[1], is just the income generated every year by all the economies of the world combined. However, the question asks about the distribution of wealth - and wealth and income are two different concepts. Wealth is stock, while income is the flow adding to that stock. In simple terms, wealth is the total productive assets in the world reduced by the total liabilities of the world. Now, the total assets in the world can be clubbed in two broad categories: Assets like patents, buildings, machines, gold etc which you own with you or put to use to earn moneyAssets like bonds, debentures etc which are monies lent out to others What’s a cool but obvious thing about no. 2 kind of assets? These are the liabilities for someone else - your liability is my asset and they cancel each other out. So what’s left? Real assets as in no. 1 assets - gold mines, patents, anything which can generate income. Now, true equality would mean equal ownership of these assets! But how do we measure the value of these assets? According to research done by Credit-Suisse, this number stands at ~$250 trillion today, which is distributed like this: Therefore, assuming the population of the world to be around 7.4 billion, if all the wealth were to be distributed equally, each one of us would be worth $34,000. You think that’s not too much huh? Nearly 75% of the world earns below that today. Except not most of us here at EvC."A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8733 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
What does your Quora quote mean? What do you think it means? How does this impact your currency fears?
And, if I may, a source to this. I would like to see their "which is distributed like this:" list.Edited by AZPaul3, . Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 201 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat, once again you are simply showing that you are totally ignorant when it comes to almost every subject including money.
The Quora passage is simply utterly stupid and created to impress those who are unwilling or incapable of thinking. Step back and explain why the Quora passage is simply utterly stupid and created to impress those who are unwilling or incapable of thinking.My Website: My Website
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AnswersInGenitals Member (Idle past 513 days) Posts: 673 Joined: |
Phat, you need to correct/update your numbers. this wikipedia article, based on Credit Suisse (2021) data shows world total net wealth as $418 trillion(USD). If I weren't too lazy to figure out how to post images from that article, I would do so. And I'd also post images of an apple and an orange for your edification - after giving a careful explanation of the difference between earnings (income) and wealth you go on to compare the world wealth per person to income!
Most interesting in this article (to me) is that the US owns 30% of the world's wealth at $126 Trillion(USD) while Russia owns all of 0.73% at $3 Trillion(USD), and are ranked 20th. (China owns 18% with $75 Trillion and comes in 2nd after the US.) Many military experts will tell you that modern wars are not won, they are bought. If this is true, Russia would not stand a chance against the US if we were to get serious about any conflict.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candle3 Member Posts: 982 Joined: Member Rating: 4.0 |
Ringo, you call believing in God a fantasy. Yet, God
commands those who truly seek Him to prove everything. Blind faith is worthless. The Bible contains many prophecies; some havealready been fulfilled, others will soon be fulfilled. There are more than 50 specific OT propheciesabout Jesus that have been fulfilled in the NT. Some Biblical scholars insist that the actual number is better than 300. For the sake of brevity, I will mention just eight. A mathematician friend at Murray State (he teachesProbabilities and Statistics) says that the probability of just eight prophecies being fulfilled is 10 followed By 17 zeroes. I will cite the OT prophecy, followed by NT fulfillment. Isaiah 7:14 born of a virgin Luke 1:35.Micah 5:2 born in Bethlehem Matthew 2:4-6. Psalms 78:1-2 teach in parables Matthew 13:34-35. Isaiah 9:1-7 begins ministry in Galilee Matthew 4:12-17. Isaiah 40:3-4 Christ preceeded by forerunner (John the Baptist). John 1:23. Isaiah 53:3 despised and rejected Luke 4:28-29. Zechariah 11:12-13 betrayed for 30 pieces of silver Matthew 27:6-10. Psalms 22:6 hands and feet pierced John 19:36-37. My church was aware from 1951 that East and WestGermany would reunite. I realized this in the early 1980's. Without a clear understanding of prophecy, I never would have thought that the Soviet Union would have freed East Germany. We knew beyond a doubt that Britain would withdrawfrom the EU. We also know that the EU will slim down to just 10 nations (married in a sense to a powerful universal church). To know what is in store for certain nations today, itis paramount that we identify who they were in Biblical times.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 18082 Joined: Member Rating: 5.0
|
quote Some have certainly failed. For instance the end times did not arrive on the schedule of Daniel 8.
quote That sort of so-called “Biblical scholar” often says things that aren’t true.
quote Let’s see how far you can go before getting one wrong.
quote Oh dear, the first one is an obvious error. The child born in Isaiah 7 is not the main prophecy but a sign that the main prophecy will shortly be fulfilled. That prophecy being that the attacks from Aram and Israel will soon be brought to an end by the Assyrians. Unless Jesus was born in the reign of Ahaz, he has nothing to do with this prophecy.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025