|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Atheism is a belief (Why Atheists don't believe part 2) | |||||||||||||||||||
ohnhai Member (Idle past 5415 days) Posts: 649 From: Melbourne, Australia Joined: |
riVeRraT writes: I Freely admit that my belief in the non-existence of the God/s could be wrong. As I can’t prove 100% their lack of existence it would be dishonest of me to say other wise. Though I firmly and resolutely BELIVE that the God/s do NOT exist, IF I was to come across some evidence that was UNDENIABLE, that proved the existence of the God/s then I would have to re-adjust my world view accordingly.
This is not dogma? Not in the slightest. This is an open and painfully honest statement of my belief. It’s not written in any book or enshrined by a religious organization as what you HAVE to believe, thus it is not dogma.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminOmni Inactive Member |
Randy, Rat--fellas, if we were in a bar, I'd ask you to take it outside: you are both shedding considerably more heat than light.
Please do not protest with finger-pointing, don't justify, and don't reply in this thread. But do, please, humor an old bear and return to the State of Civility. Edited by AdminOmni, : added names Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to: New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out: Trust me.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ohnhai Member (Idle past 5415 days) Posts: 649 From: Melbourne, Australia Joined: |
Larni writes: Is this not the position of the agnostic? No. An Agnostic is uncertain as to the existence of the God/s. an Atheist {strong} has no uncertainty as to the existence of the God/s. While its true that an Atheist {strong} can not prove this stance as this would require the proof of a negative (thus requiring knowledge of EVERYTHING) that doesn’t mean it’s an un tenable position. It’s is fair and valid to hold this view as a belief. I am certain that the God/s don’t exist. Absolutely certain. I truly and utterly believe this to be the case. However, I freely admit I could be wrong. This stance is not, in the least bit, uncertain, not fuzzy round the edges, and thus not Agnostic.
Larni writes: However my point was that the default position of every human being is that of non-belief in religious doctorine and that we make an active choice by ascribing to a religion. Someone who is not religious only needs to make a chice about religions he has been exposed to. I concur. The second half of my post was a more general comment to the thread and not a rebuttal of your stance (sorry for any confusion)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What the hell are you talking about? I went to a 4-year liberal arts college and never once did any professor ever "make any case against God". In fact, in several of my history courses we learned of various religious beliefs, and never once did the professor ever say (or even remotely imply), "and by the way, these are false religions." Did you ever go to a secular college, rat, or are you just repeating propaganda again? Edited by schrafinator, : kan't sepl
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Maybe when it happens in a Danish film. OMG, ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fantastic, utterly fantastic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Can I come too if I bring a triple batch of my grandmother's recipe for potato salad?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
But to have a belief about an external consciousness you need a Theory of Mind. At 1.5 years you did not have this. quote: Irrelevant. You don't understand what "theory of mind" means. In short, it means: "the ability to understand that others have beliefs, desires and intentions that are different from one's own."
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Why should they be concerned with telling people what to believe in?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Sure it does. Everybody is born an Atheist, as I've said before. It's only when we are able to absorb cultural messages do we aquire religion and belief in Gods from our families and society at large.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
All Good Atheists welcome in Heaven, didn't you know? We gonna have all the brothers, all the good Atheists, Agnostics, Buddhists, Satanists, Wiccans, Taoists, Mulsims, Jews, Hindus, all the folk that make a great hoedown. It will be a great day, good food, good friends and damn few fundie Christians.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2422 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: OK, then everybody is born an Agnostic?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17912 Joined: Member Rating: 6.7 |
quote: Sicne a dogma is a belief it can be true or false. The "the truth of the dogma" means "whether the dogma is true or not". It's prefectly ordinary English.
quote: Then since it supports my views and contradicts your assertions you should have conceded that I was correct.
quote: It means under the definition of atheism we are using there are NO beliefs that an atheist must hold. Therefore under that definition of atheism there cannot be an atheist dogma. Under the definition of atheism as a belief that God does not exist you have one belief but you need to show that it fits the rest of the definition of "dogma". The first word in that definition is "authoritative" - so where is the relevant "authority" ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 6161 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
jar
All Good Atheists welcome in Heaven, didn't you know? You better be ready to tear up some powder snow in those heavenly valleys jar. Dress warm and bring some beer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member (Idle past 128 days) Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: |
Um, where's the problem? We are temporally limited entities, just like toasters, so you can only find us in certain portions of time. The terms we use like "cease to be" come from our very limited means of perceiving time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member (Idle past 106 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
I stand corrected.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024