Noah's Flood and the Geologic Layers (was Noah's shallow sea)

Seriously Ned what you been administering up that big nose? No trace? You seem the type that would try to explain away Noah's ark if it were found. Why don't you open up one of your boring threads on "Ned say's theres no flood evidence at all" By the way, since Joe hasn't yet told us, what was that burrower anyhow?

Ned's, right, there is absolutely NO trace of the flood.I don't see why you're even arguing the point seeing as you can't tell us which geologic strata represent the flood either. Here we are on the 10th page of this thread and still no flood layers from simple the Creationist.If I were you, I'd keep your 12 year-old sounding snide remarks to yourself until you can answer this one simple question -WHERE ARE THE FLOOD LAYERS?Edited for grammatical reasons - DOH!![This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-12-2004]

Hi, Simple!Please restrict your participation in the future to the Free For All forum and other non-Main Topic Forums (see List of Forums - you're no longer permitted in the forums listed under "Main Topic Forums").

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Administrator

Aw and I was just about to join in too... Looks like I'll have to go find another thread with simple...

This is Simple's thread - if no one objects, I'll move it to Free For All later today.PS - Really cool avatar!

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Administrator

to you simple 1)now was that hard you finally pinned down a period,but still you will not show any proof if you went to court this unprepared the judge would dismiss you.show proof 2)im happy and all i have to do to stay that way is to look at my daughters

so you never lived through a hurricane(i have see i live in florida and we seem to have them hit every so often).im going to leave your super flare to the experts but even i know that that would leave proof.did you think it up yourself or did someone help you.

quote:

---

This is Simple's thread - if no one objects, I'll move it to Free For All later today.

---

Does it not seem odd, to banish Simple from a forum, and a topic of that forum, only to move same topic to a forum where Simple is permitted? Even if it was Simple who started the topic?Well, I guess it may be the thing to do. But when Simple acts "simple", is it time to really explore the art of flaming?I also object to members starting topics in the "Welcome, Visitors!" forum, aimed at those who refuse to register.Moose

{qscan't tell us which geologic strata represent the flood either{/qs Unless someone can prove otherwise I am going to assume all layers may have been affected, where we see life.

FINALLY!!! An answer. Now we can get to work...

And which period do you imagine I was 'pinned down' to? It seems Ned was pinned down admitting he accepts no evidence at all in all the world of a flood! Which means he religiously attributes all evidence as opposing one. Sice such reasoning assumes 1) There was no flood 2)The worldwide evidence on creation side is all false, since he says no evidence exists 3)That a flood must need follow his set of ideas of what would be left, based on very limited criteria which rules out flood from getgo. So far you have imagined burrowers, apparently, assumed anti flood dates, and an attitude of self rightousness. I don't see a need for a particular planet wide layer that you do. There is layers, and I see them pretty well all as indications of worldwide sudden death. Even when you are presented with a simple bunch of sea fossils high on a mountain, you offer only an exercise in creative imagination, and story telling, and can't even seem to get to an easy point of why it was indeed necessary to have some uplifting and such, rather than just the mud, and sediment layers by themselves do it. Todays processes are not at all like most of the processes at work in a flood, yet you insist on trying to limit what did happen with preconceptions, and tring to put God in your box. Then you wonder why He just will not fit. It's much bigger than you understand. Talk about 'clouds without water'. You ain't deep, you just ain't very clear! How many areas in the world are there no sediment deposits at all? How many continents have had no fossils found?

I object

removed weird double-post.[This message has been edited by roxrkool, 02-12-2004]

The sun site I looked at says there was a huge ammount of activity, some thousands of years ago! (Of course I can't fault them for the dates, as I know where they get them, but this means to me, when they say 10 12000 years, it was somewhere around just the right time). Who can say, if that, along with (perhaps ones much much bigger than you could dream of in Florida) hurricanes, sliding continents, etc. could affect magnetism. It seems it would really flip it out! So try not to sound too certain of your selves!

By the way, thanks folks, if they move this, I won't follow. Have fun.