Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,480 Year: 3,737/9,624 Month: 608/974 Week: 221/276 Day: 61/34 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are Uranium Halos the best evidence of (a) an old earth AND (b) constant physics?
Woodsy
Member (Idle past 3396 days)
Posts: 301
From: Burlington, Canada
Joined: 08-30-2006


Message 69 of 142 (489165)
11-24-2008 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by peaceharris
11-24-2008 12:44 AM


Re: added comment, Cavediver
If you start with the assumption that the initial activity of U234 was approximately the same as U238, (since this is what is observed in all natural waters and magmas today)
This is often not the case. Waters are known in which the U-234 is highly enriched. The decays leading to U-234 can leave it in a quite different chemical state from the parent U-238, through what are called hot-atom effects. Further, the intermediate nuclides have quite different chemistries. For example, thorium is often insoluble where uranium is soluble. If you are actually thinking of U-235, which is primordial, your comments are correct.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by peaceharris, posted 11-24-2008 12:44 AM peaceharris has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by peaceharris, posted 11-24-2008 11:22 PM Woodsy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024