Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4190 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 25 of 1498 (507364)
05-04-2009 8:35 AM


Moved from Among Scientists, How Broad is Concensus?
TRV777 writes:
the evidence for a young earth is growing.
I writes:
So provide some. And not some biblical passage, some concrete evidence that has not be refuted 1000 times (PRATT).
AdminNosy writes:
Just a reminder. The topic of this thread is NOT the age of the earth. The intelligent, handsome, witty, debonair poster NosyNed suggested a thread to take that issue to.
Well we'll try the question here

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4190 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 26 of 1498 (507406)
05-04-2009 6:45 PM


Trev777 writes:
Also a pre-Flood vapour canopy would have inhibited formation of carbon14 in the upper atmosphere, so items dated soon after the Flood would appear much older.
There is no evidence of such. Even AIG (Answers in Genesis) recommends that the "Vapor Canopy" be not used. One point is such a canopy would preclude life on this planet as the heat from such would have made the earth's temperature similar to that of Venus.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Rahvin, posted 05-04-2009 8:00 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4190 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 30 of 1498 (507431)
05-05-2009 2:10 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by RAZD
05-04-2009 8:20 PM


Re: The topic is correlations.
see my remark in
Vapour canopy and fountains of the deep
Edited by bluescat48, : clarity

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 05-04-2009 8:20 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024