|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
|
| |
| ChatGPT | |
| Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0 |
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: Uranium Dating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2504 days)  Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined:
|
archaeologist??!! writes: they cannot make the claim that this fish is an intermediary simply because all they have is a partial skull....... Really?
They have a lot more than a partial skull. This is just one of the three found.
.......and no observation of it being produced by a lesser form and no observation of it changing into a superior form. It is not a question of "lesser" or "superior". They have preceding fish "forms", and later amphibian "forms" like Ichthyostega. Tiktaalik has fins with wrists and simple digits. Fin/legs are a good illustration of transition. {ABE} Realising that the topic is dating, I'll add that the discoverers of Tiktaalik were deliberately looking for such a creature in rocks that they knew were dated to the right period, demonstrating the validity of the dating. Edited by bluegenes, : relating post to topic!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2504 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
(1)
