It's the same evidence, just a different conclusion.
No, it's not, because there is evidence (like the
convergence in phylogenies between Geomyidae and Geomydoecus) which evolution can and does explain but "creation science" does not.
What is the creationism explanation for Geomyidae and Geomydoecus? In five years I've not had a single creationist be able to supply an answer. Maybe you'll be the first.