I am not going to muddy up this thread as I had a clear idea of where I was going when I asked this question to AndyP. I was working on a response to mental “disorder” issue and believe you me both the ”ED’ and the question of British use of equations (Russell, Fisher etc still comes up) I am linking a pre-draft onto the thread about me
http://
EvC Forum: All about Brad McFall. -->
EvC Forum: All about Brad McFall.just so you know I am not ignoring you. Most recently I have corresponded with ICR about “organized complexity” when it came up in a thread here on EVC, about the time Modulous started posting, and I do know about ICR abroad. Here in the US I was dismayed last Sunday when my church had an adult education session on ID and they failed to even reach this level of understanding we already have on EVC, that ID might be but it needs to present more evidence and this from a Church with members lacking in response, including elders, being profs of history, biology, physics, and chemical engineering at Cornell.
Where this link and not this thread is headed is toward showing were design of subtraction of rational representations from light in flame spectra of fundamental series made of electrons and photons offers a pallete for design in science not before used. If god is already using it, all the better. But I need to work on the specific versimultudes of variance biometry first, which is why the post is not ready for an ordered belief post. That’s the best I have in reply through Dan’s clever cleever.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 02-25-2006 08:27 AM