Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,568 Year: 3,825/9,624 Month: 696/974 Week: 23/286 Day: 23/58 Hour: 11/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is creationism winning in Turkey & Korea?
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5056 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 2 of 77 (10565)
05-29-2002 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Andya Primanda
05-28-2002 4:47 AM


Do you have any idea why "europe" is 'ignorant' of what you wrote? My take has been clouded by US law relative to the grounding of morals and I am unable to understand why duty has not called on say Brits to recognize that their use and large control of the dissemination of information in equations tended becasue they were so calculated to have not had the word's time that say some one who writes a script with more marks above the letter would tend to appreciated in a network ed world that was here the difference of formal and emprical psychology that having read it that was all that was accepted to be known short of silence.?? any idea in this line or should I begin to show how heteronomy is confused in the drug industry with heterogenous equilibria. GOuld's death prove what I Observed on campus that no one had been able to even talk let alone write about popularly multi-peak equilbrium attractor orbits that are only trajectories and do not need to follow in a line betWEEn the Sun and Earth.##

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Andya Primanda, posted 05-28-2002 4:47 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by inkorrekt, posted 02-24-2006 11:34 AM Brad McFall has replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5056 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 6 of 77 (290276)
02-25-2006 8:22 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by inkorrekt
02-24-2006 11:34 AM


all over the world; not in my Church
I am not going to muddy up this thread as I had a clear idea of where I was going when I asked this question to AndyP. I was working on a response to mental “disorder” issue and believe you me both the ”ED’ and the question of British use of equations (Russell, Fisher etc still comes up) I am linking a pre-draft onto the thread about me
http://EvC Forum: All about Brad McFall. -->EvC Forum: All about Brad McFall.
just so you know I am not ignoring you. Most recently I have corresponded with ICR about “organized complexity” when it came up in a thread here on EVC, about the time Modulous started posting, and I do know about ICR abroad. Here in the US I was dismayed last Sunday when my church had an adult education session on ID and they failed to even reach this level of understanding we already have on EVC, that ID might be but it needs to present more evidence and this from a Church with members lacking in response, including elders, being profs of history, biology, physics, and chemical engineering at Cornell.
Where this link and not this thread is headed is toward showing were design of subtraction of rational representations from light in flame spectra of fundamental series made of electrons and photons offers a pallete for design in science not before used. If god is already using it, all the better. But I need to work on the specific versimultudes of variance biometry first, which is why the post is not ready for an ordered belief post. That’s the best I have in reply through Dan’s clever cleever.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 02-25-2006 08:27 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by inkorrekt, posted 02-24-2006 11:34 AM inkorrekt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024